Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services · Florida

Joy Global Surface Mining, Inc. Fort Meade

Fort Meade, FL · ~23 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Joy Global Surface Mining, Inc. Fort Meade runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade C.

Joy Global Surface Mining, Inc. Fort Meade: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services BLS 2.1 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Joy Global Surface Mining, Inc. Fort Meade safety composite

Joy Global Surface Mining, Inc. Fort Meade scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Joy Global Surface Mining, Inc. Fort Meade held a steady TCR band

Joy Global Surface Mining, Inc. Fort Meade's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2016 at 0.0 TCR.

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · Fort Meade, FL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/122
  • PHOTO Beaumont Branch
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Beaumont Branch (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Joy Global Surface Mining, Inc. Fort Meade in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Joy Global Surface Mining, Inc. Fort Meade averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Joy Global Surface Mining, Inc. Fort Meade TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · BLS 2.1

Where Joy Global Surface Mining, Inc. Fort Meade falls in its industry

2,560 Agricultural machinery and equ establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 122 Agricultural machinery and equ employers in Florida.

Joy Global Surface Mining, Inc. Fort Meade (23 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Joy Global Surface Mining, Inc. Fort Meade
Joy Global Surface Mining, Inc. Fort Meade (23 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Joy Global Surface Mining, Inc. Fort Meade has fewer employees than the Agricultural machinery and equipment rep median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · FL · Fort Meade

2,560 Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 4 employers in Fort Meade, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Beaumont Branch 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR New Orleans Branch 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Power Services : PS FS North America (US Only) 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Miner Tampa 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE GOPHER RIDGE GROVE 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE DESOTO GROVE 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Oasis 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1247- HA- Live Oak, FL 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fort Meade, FL 89 FTE
CITY-NEAR Packinghouse 37 FTE
CITY-NEAR Harvesting 28 FTE
NAT-TCR Hampton Inn & Suites 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Gap Inc. - Corporate 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Atlanta - Phipps 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Meijer 208 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Middle School 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Felderman Management Corp 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bay Lakes Manufacturing, Inc. 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE American Furniture Rental-Portland 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.