Concrete sawing and drilling (except demolition) · New York

JP Hogan Coring & Sawing Corp

Staten Island, NY · ~40 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.5
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

JP Hogan Coring & Sawing Corp runs at 196% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Concrete sawing and drilling (except demolition) workplace, earning a grade D.

JP Hogan Coring & Sawing Corp: 5.5 TCR = 196% of Concrete sawing and drilling (except demolition) BLS 2.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

JP Hogan Coring & Sawing Corp safety composite

JP Hogan Coring & Sawing Corp scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

29/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.1

2016→2021

JP Hogan Coring & Sawing Corp injury rate improved

JP Hogan Coring & Sawing Corp's TCR fell 3.1 from 6.0 in 2016 to 2.9 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 9.8 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.53× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.0 · 2017=3.1 · 2018=5.7 · 2019=5.4 · 2020=9.8 · 2021=2.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238990 · Staten Island, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.5 · 196% of ind

  • DART 2.9 DART
  • RANK #44/53
  • PHOTO Advanced Pavement Gr…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~40 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Advanced Pavement Group Central Jersey Branch (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

JP Hogan Coring & Sawing Corp in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows JP Hogan Coring & Sawing Corp averages 5.5 TCR (196% of the Concrete sawing and drilling (except demolition) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

JP Hogan Coring & Sawing Corp TCR series: 2016=6 · 2017=3.1 · 2018=5.7 · 2019=5.4 · 2020=9.8 · 2021=2.9 · BLS 2.8

Where JP Hogan Coring & Sawing Corp falls in its industry

1,634 Concrete sawing and drilling ( establishments

Safer than 19% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #44 safest of 53 Concrete sawing and drilling ( employers in New York.

JP Hogan Coring & Sawing Corp (40 employees, TCR 5.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate JP Hogan Coring & Sawing Corp
JP Hogan Coring & Sawing Corp (40 employees, TCR 5.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 1.9

JP Hogan Coring & Sawing Corp has fewer employees than the Concrete sawing and drilling (except dem median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 2.9 2.9 1 0 0
2020 9.8 9.8 3 0 0
2019 5.4 5.4 2 0 0
2018 5.7 5.7 2 0 0
2017 3.1 3.1 1 0 0
2016 6.0 6.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238990 · NY · Staten Island

1,634 Concrete sawing and drilling (except demolition) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 256 employers in Staten Island, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Advanced Pavement Group Central Jersey Branch 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR R&M Paving & Sealing Inc 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lyons & Hohl Paving Contractor 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Black Ops Concrete Construction 5.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bilow Farms, LLC 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Farm 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Constantine Construction and Farm, Inc. 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Burrows Bros. Inc. 40 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - JFK8 5,178 FTE
CITY-NEAR Staten Island University Hospital North 4,947 FTE
CITY-NEAR Staten Island U Hosp North 4,711 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : JFK8 3,988 FTE
NAT-TCR Bardons & Oliver 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR The Orchard 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Tft #579 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR River Valley Cooperative-Geneseo 5.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Albany, GA HVAC 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Speyside Bourbon Stave Mill in Kentucky, Inc. 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Manchester, NH/Portland, ME HVAC 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Edencrest Green Meadows 40 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.