Building materials (e.g., fascia, panels, siding, soffit), plastics, manufacturing · Tennessee

JP Lamborn - Mascot

Mascot, TN · ~48 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

JP Lamborn - Mascot runs at 83% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Building materials (e.g., fascia, panels, siding, soffit), plastics, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

JP Lamborn - Mascot: 2.7 TCR = 83% of Building materials (e.g., fascia, panels, siding, soffit), plastics, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

JP Lamborn - Mascot safety composite

JP Lamborn - Mascot scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 61% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 49%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.8

2016→2023

JP Lamborn - Mascot injury rate improved

JP Lamborn - Mascot's TCR fell 0.8 from 2.6 in 2016 to 1.7 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2018 at 9.9 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.63× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.6 · 2018=9.9 · 2019=2.3 · 2020=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=1.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326199 · Mascot, TN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.7 · 83% of ind

  • DART 1.7 DART
  • RANK #30/66
  • PHOTO Mitchell Plastics St…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~48 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Mitchell Plastics Sterling Heights (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

JP Lamborn - Mascot in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows JP Lamborn - Mascot averages 2.7 TCR (83% of the Building materials (e.g., fascia, panels, siding, soffit), plastics, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

JP Lamborn - Mascot TCR series: 2016=2.6 · 2018=9.9 · 2019=2.3 · 2020=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=1.7 · BLS 3.3

Where JP Lamborn - Mascot falls in its industry

2,838 Building materials (e.g., fasc establishments

Safer than 61% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #30 safest of 66 Building materials (e.g., fasc employers in Tennessee.

JP Lamborn - Mascot (48 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate JP Lamborn - Mascot
JP Lamborn - Mascot (48 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5

JP Lamborn - Mascot has fewer employees than the Building materials (e.g., fascia, panels median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 1.7 1.7 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.3 0.0 1 0 0
2018 9.9 9.9 4 0 0
2016 2.6 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326199 · TN · Mascot

2,838 Building materials (e.g., fascia, panels, siding, soffit), plastics, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 5 employers in Mascot, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Mitchell Plastics Sterling Heights 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR VISCOFAN USA INC 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Atrium Windows & Door 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dimex 2.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bolivar Energy Authority 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Electric Department 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jefferson Cocke County Utility District 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Chattanooga Service Center 48 FTE
CITY-NEAR Exedy America Corporation 457 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mascot 157 FTE
CITY-NEAR MASCOT (Knoxville), TN 61 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tennessee Steel Center 20 FTE
NAT-TCR Big Lots Store #5249 Barnegat, NJ 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR NJ CBS Montvale 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Gregory Poole Marine- Beaufort 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Quality Inn at the Mall 2.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE JP Lamborn - Denver 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Longview Glass Co. 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE PF LW ALF Ops, LLC 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hammer Inc 48 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.