Rims, automotive, truck, and bus wheel, manufacturing · Ohio

JR Engineering

Barberton, OH · ~124 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.3
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

JR Engineering runs at 24% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Rims, automotive, truck, and bus wheel, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

JR Engineering: 1.3 TCR = 24% of Rims, automotive, truck, and bus wheel, manufacturing BLS 5.4 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

JR Engineering safety composite

JR Engineering scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 89% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 89% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.2

2016→2024

JR Engineering injury rate improved

JR Engineering's TCR fell 2.2 from 2.2 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 3.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.2 · 2017=2.7 · 2018=3.2 · 2019=0.8 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=2.0 · 2023=0.7 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336390 · Barberton, OH AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.3 · 24% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #8/91
  • PHOTO 8462_19263
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~124 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 8462_19263 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

JR Engineering in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows JR Engineering averages 1.3 TCR (24% of the Rims, automotive, truck, and bus wheel, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

JR Engineering TCR series: 2016=2.2 · 2017=2.7 · 2018=3.2 · 2019=0.8 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=2 · 2023=0.7 · 2024=0 · BLS 5.4

Where JR Engineering falls in its industry

772 Rims, automotive, truck, and b establishments

Safer than 87% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 91 Rims, automotive, truck, and b employers in Ohio.

JR Engineering (124 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 154 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate JR Engineering
JR Engineering (124 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 154 employees and a TCR of 3.2

JR Engineering has fewer employees than the Rims, automotive, truck, and bus wheel, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.7 0.0 1 0 0
2022 2.0 1.0 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.8 0.0 1 0 0
2018 3.2 2.1 6 0 0
2017 2.7 2.7 4 0 0
2016 2.2 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336390 · OH · Barberton

772 Rims, automotive, truck, and bus wheel, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 58 employers in Barberton, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 8462_19263 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Meritor Industrial Products, LLC 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Shiloh Industries - Galesburg 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bergstrom Inc., Falcon Rd 1.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Miami Fort Power Station 124 FTE
STATE-SIZE Haag-Streit USA 124 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pepper Construction Ohio, LLC 124 FTE
STATE-SIZE Region 108 124 FTE
CITY-NEAR Barberton Campus 888 FTE
CITY-NEAR BWX Technologies, Inc. Nuclear Operations Group - Barberton 825 FTE
CITY-NEAR BWX Technologies, LLC 737 FTE
CITY-NEAR S.A. Comunale - Norton 612 FTE
NAT-TCR Certified Fireproofing, Inc. 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR County of Santa Clara Health System, Valley Health Plan (725) 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR S05863 - Mill Seat Landfill 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR CMC Steel Florida 1.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Eagle Distributing of Shreveport, Inc. 124 FTE
NAT-SIZE BURLINGTON 124 FTE
NAT-SIZE West Houston 156 124 FTE
NAT-SIZE Highland Campus 124 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.