Heating and ventilation system component (e.g., air registers, diffusers, filters, grilles, sound attenuators) installation · Georgia

J.R. Hobbs

Lawrenceville, GA · ~257 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.3
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

J.R. Hobbs runs at 83% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Heating and ventilation system component (e.g., air registers, diffusers, filters, grilles, sound attenuators) installation workplace, earning a grade C.

J.R. Hobbs: 2.3 TCR = 83% of Heating and ventilation system component (e.g., air registers, diffusers, filters, grilles, sound attenuators) installation BLS 2.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

J.R. Hobbs safety composite

J.R. Hobbs scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 63% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2017→2023

J.R. Hobbs injury rate improved

J.R. Hobbs's TCR fell 0.4 from 2.8 in 2017 to 2.4 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 3.3 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.21× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=2.8 · 2021=0.8 · 2022=3.3 · 2023=2.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238220 · Lawrenceville, GA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 2.3 · 83% of ind

  • DART 0.5 DART
  • RANK #56/123
  • PHOTO Jayhawk Fire Sprinkl…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~257 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Jayhawk Fire Sprinkler Co Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

J.R. Hobbs in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows J.R. Hobbs averages 2.3 TCR (83% of the Heating and ventilation system component (e.g., air registers, diffusers, filters, grilles, sound attenuators) installation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

J.R. Hobbs TCR series: 2017=2.8 · 2021=0.8 · 2022=3.3 · 2023=2.4 · BLS 2.8

Where J.R. Hobbs falls in its industry

5,793 Heating and ventilation system establishments

Safer than 63% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #56 safest of 123 Heating and ventilation system employers in Georgia.

J.R. Hobbs (257 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate J.R. Hobbs
J.R. Hobbs (257 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3

J.R. Hobbs has more employees than the Heating and ventilation system component median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 2.4 0.5 5 0 0
2022 3.3 3.3 8 0 0
2021 0.8 0.0 2 0 0
2017 2.8 1.7 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238220 · GA · Lawrenceville

5,793 Heating and ventilation system component (e.g., air registers, diffusers, filters, grilles, sound attenuators) installation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 253 employers in Lawrenceville, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Jayhawk Fire Sprinkler Co Inc 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR All Fire Services Inc 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR S.A. Comunale - Marion 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Climate Pros Santa Rosa 2.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE GA330 Warm Springs Plywood 257 FTE
STATE-SIZE CKS Fisk 257 FTE
STATE-SIZE Vanguard National Trailer Trenton GA 257 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 2753 257 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northside Hospital Gwinnett 5,762 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gwinnett Medical Center Lawrenceville 3,363 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gwinnett Medical Center - Lawrenceville 3,250 FTE
CITY-NEAR W.A. Kendall and Co., LLC 1,075 FTE
NAT-TCR Platinum Electrical Services, Inc. 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Hazard Svc Ctr 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Dayton Superior Corporation Rialto 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Lambright Woodworking, LLC 2.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE JSL Technologies, Inc. 257 FTE
NAT-SIZE Crown Laboratories, Inc. 257 FTE
NAT-SIZE Corning Optical Communications LLC 257 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ilegr - Scs Elk Grove - 3844 257 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.