Asphalt coating and sealing, residential and commercial parking lot and driveway · California

J&S Asphalt

Rocklin, CA · ~66 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.9
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

J&S Asphalt runs at 245% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Asphalt coating and sealing, residential and commercial parking lot and driveway workplace, earning a grade F.

J&S Asphalt: 6.9 TCR = 245% of Asphalt coating and sealing, residential and commercial parking lot and driveway BLS 2.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

J&S Asphalt safety composite

J&S Asphalt scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

J&S Asphalt: 0.0 → 2.9 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 15.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0.21× in 2024

J&S Asphalt's TCR rose 2.9 from 0.0 in 2021 to 2.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 15.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.21× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238990 · Rocklin, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 6.9 · 245% of ind

  • DART 1.5 DART
  • RANK #134/171
  • PHOTO Phoenix Scaffolding …
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~66 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Phoenix Scaffolding & Equipment Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

J&S Asphalt in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows J&S Asphalt averages 6.9 TCR (245% of the Asphalt coating and sealing, residential and commercial parking lot and driveway BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

J&S Asphalt TCR series: 2021=0 · 2022=15 · 2023=9.6 · 2024=2.9 · BLS 2.8

Where J&S Asphalt falls in its industry

1,634 Asphalt coating and sealing, r establishments

Safer than 13% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #134 safest of 171 Asphalt coating and sealing, r employers in California.

J&S Asphalt (66 employees, TCR 6.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate J&S Asphalt
J&S Asphalt (66 employees, TCR 6.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 1.9

J&S Asphalt has more employees than the Asphalt coating and sealing, residential median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.9 1.5 2 0 0
2023 9.6 1.6 6 0 0
2022 15.0 0.0 10 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238990 · CA · Rocklin

1,634 Asphalt coating and sealing, residential and commercial parking lot and driveway employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 127 employers in Rocklin, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Phoenix Scaffolding & Equipment Inc. 6.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Eddie Edwards Signs, Inc 6.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR L&H Companies 6.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR R & C Fence, Inc. 6.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Nuseed Americas, Inc., West Sacramento Innovation Center 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE ORGANIC BUNCH HARVESTING 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE Navco Berry Harvest 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE kings orchards, llc 66 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 75 2,413 FTE
CITY-NEAR Infinity Energy Inc. 676 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ace Hardware Retail Support Center 562 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sacramento Retail Support Center - Ace Hardware 515 FTE
NAT-TCR Livingston 6.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Berry 6.9 TCR
NAT-TCR St. Cloud Area Family YMCA 6.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Richmond Community Schools-Dennis Intermediate 6.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Melrose Park, IL - Proviso Drive 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE Louisville, KY - 3600 Chamberlain Lane 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE 104732 - HDOT - Kapalama Wharf & Dredging 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE 8027222 Rederlink Distribution Services LLC 66 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.