Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) · Massachusetts

JST Transportation

Franklin, MA · ~153 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.9
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

JST Transportation runs at 61% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) workplace, earning a grade B.

JST Transportation: 3.9 TCR = 61% of Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS 6.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

JST Transportation safety composite

JST Transportation scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 95% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 3.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 95% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.6

2018→2022

JST Transportation injury rate improved

JST Transportation's TCR fell 1.6 from 1.6 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2020 at 12.1 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=1.6 · 2019=6.0 · 2020=12.1 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492110 · Franklin, MA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 3.9 · 61% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #19/164
  • PHOTO Crimson Logistics LLC
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 27 inj
  • SIZE ~153 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Crimson Logistics LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

JST Transportation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows JST Transportation averages 3.9 TCR (61% of the Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

JST Transportation TCR series: 2018=1.6 · 2019=6 · 2020=12.1 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · BLS 6.5

Where JST Transportation falls in its industry

6,679 Courier services (i.e., interc establishments

Safer than 85% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #19 safest of 164 Courier services (i.e., interc employers in Massachusetts.

JST Transportation (153 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate JST Transportation
JST Transportation (153 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0

JST Transportation has more employees than the Courier services (i.e., intercity networ median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 12.1 12.1 15 0 0
2019 6.0 4.8 10 0 0
2018 1.6 1.6 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492110 · MA · Franklin

6,679 Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 85 employers in Franklin, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Crimson Logistics LLC 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - HOK2 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR SDWAT - WATERTOWN 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR LONDON (KYLON) 3.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Barletta Engineering Corp. 153 FTE
STATE-SIZE JM Electrical Company 153 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lexington Homes 153 FTE
STATE-SIZE Phillips-Medisize Northeast 153 FTE
CITY-NEAR Taunton 1,691 FTE
CITY-NEAR Franklin 55 675 FTE
CITY-NEAR Franklin 50 670 FTE
CITY-NEAR Horace Mann Educational Associates 633 FTE
NAT-TCR 359613-Nyc-Knickerbocker Sta 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 350971-Bkn-Flatbush Sta 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 414078-Johnstown Pa P&Dc-Inshd 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 414583-Lehigh Valley Pa P&Dc 3.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE 6400-SWY-0024-0024-03460 153 FTE
NAT-SIZE 6400-SWY-0019-0019-01558 153 FTE
NAT-SIZE 6400-SWY-0019-0019-01516 153 FTE
NAT-SIZE 6400-SWY-0019-0019-01489 153 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.