Fence installation (except electronic containment fencing for pets) · California

Judge Netting, Inc.

Garden Grove, CA · ~28 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.2
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Judge Netting, Inc. runs at 186% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Fence installation (except electronic containment fencing for pets) workplace, earning a grade D.

Judge Netting, Inc.: 5.2 TCR = 186% of Fence installation (except electronic containment fencing for pets) BLS 2.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Judge Netting, Inc. safety composite

Judge Netting, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 21%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.8

2019→2024

Judge Netting, Inc. injury rate improved

Judge Netting, Inc.'s TCR fell 8.8 from 8.8 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 9.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=8.8 · 2021=7.4 · 2022=9.8 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238990 · Garden Grove, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.2 · 186% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #111/171
  • PHOTO Commercial Scaffoldi…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Commercial Scaffolding of Northern CA, Inc.--Pittsburg Div. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Judge Netting, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Judge Netting, Inc. averages 5.2 TCR (186% of the Fence installation (except electronic containment fencing for pets) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Judge Netting, Inc. TCR series: 2019=8.8 · 2021=7.4 · 2022=9.8 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Judge Netting, Inc. falls in its industry

1,634 Fence installation (except ele establishments

Safer than 21% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #111 safest of 171 Fence installation (except ele employers in California.

Judge Netting, Inc. (28 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Judge Netting, Inc.
Judge Netting, Inc. (28 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Judge Netting, Inc. has fewer employees than the Fence installation (except electronic co median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 9.8 9.8 3 0 0
2021 7.4 7.4 2 0 0
2019 8.8 8.8 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238990 · CA · Garden Grove

1,634 Fence installation (except electronic containment fencing for pets) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 145 employers in Garden Grove, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Commercial Scaffolding of Northern CA, Inc.--Pittsburg Div. 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR hth Cedar Rapids 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Town & Country Fence 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR RLC Coburg 5.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Davis Ranch L.L.C. 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Steinbeck Country Produce 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Harlan Family Ranch 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE KKG Equipment Company, LLC32 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR Southland Industries 6,124 FTE
CITY-NEAR City Hall 677 FTE
CITY-NEAR Great Wolf Lodge 649 FTE
CITY-NEAR King Janitorial Equipment Services 645 FTE
NAT-TCR 5325-Mountain View Waste 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 4001 Beaverton 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 3633 High Point 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 2785 Three Rivers 5.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Piggly Wiggly 418 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE P&M Garden Services, Inc. 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Oahu 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Constellation 28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.