HVAC (heating, ventilation and air-conditioning) contractors · Pennsylvania

Junction Climate Control

Cheswick, PA · ~35 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
5.8
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Junction Climate Control runs at 209% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical HVAC (heating, ventilation and air-conditioning) contractors workplace, earning a grade F.

Junction Climate Control: 5.8 TCR = 209% of HVAC (heating, ventilation and air-conditioning) contractors BLS 2.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Junction Climate Control safety composite

Junction Climate Control scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 14%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

29/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Junction Climate Control: 0.0 → 5.4 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 12.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0.92× in 2024

Junction Climate Control's TCR rose 5.4 from 0.0 in 2016 to 5.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 12.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.92× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238220 · Cheswick, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 5.8 · 209% of ind

  • DART 5.4 DART
  • RANK #189/268
  • PHOTO Southport Engineered…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~35 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Southport Engineered Systems (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Junction Climate Control in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Junction Climate Control averages 5.8 TCR (209% of the HVAC (heating, ventilation and air-conditioning) contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Junction Climate Control TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=6.4 · 2018=6.2 · 2019=5.7 · 2020=2.9 · 2021=5.2 · 2022=8.9 · 2023=12 · 2024=5.4 · BLS 2.8

Where Junction Climate Control falls in its industry

5,793 HVAC (heating, ventilation and establishments

Safer than 28% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #189 safest of 268 HVAC (heating, ventilation and employers in Pennsylvania.

Junction Climate Control (35 employees, TCR 5.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Junction Climate Control
Junction Climate Control (35 employees, TCR 5.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Junction Climate Control has fewer employees than the HVAC (heating, ventilation and air-condi median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.4 5.4 2 0 0
2023 12.0 0.0 4 0 0
2022 8.9 3.0 3 0 0
2021 5.2 5.2 2 0 0
2020 2.9 0.0 1 0 0
2019 5.7 2.8 1 1 0
2018 6.2 0.0 2 0 0
2017 6.4 3.2 2 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238220 · PA · Cheswick

5,793 HVAC (heating, ventilation and air-conditioning) contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 30 employers in Cheswick, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Southport Engineered Systems 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR RRSC Atlanta 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR NBLY Co Ops CCO SPV LLC d/b/a Mr. Rooter Plumbing of Colorado Springs 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Guenther Mechanical, Inc. 5.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE W.A.C. Mushrooms Inc. 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Highland Oysters 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mushroom Spawning, Inc. 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE PANTHER CREEK POWER OPERATING 35 FTE
CITY-NEAR Curtiss Wright - Cheswick Facility 721 FTE
CITY-NEAR HarmarVillage Care Center 229 FTE
CITY-NEAR Glass Technology Center 219 FTE
CITY-NEAR Harmar Village Care Center 187 FTE
NAT-TCR R+L Carriers - OMH 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Boise 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Concrete Cutting & Breaking Co. 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR KMC - KUKA Systems N.A. LLC 5.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE WCAT Wichita Falls 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE WCAT Tulsa PSD 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nagle Signs Inc. 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Schoitz Engineering Inc. 35 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.