General Warehousing and Storage · New Jersey

JV Transportation Consultants dba Freight Force

Elizabeth, NJ · ~117 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
6.6
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

JV Transportation Consultants dba Freight Force runs at 114% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical General Warehousing and Storage workplace, earning a grade C.

JV Transportation Consultants dba Freight Force: 6.6 TCR = 114% of General Warehousing and Storage BLS 5.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

JV Transportation Consultants dba Freight Force safety composite

JV Transportation Consultants dba Freight Force scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 21%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.8

2017→2019

JV Transportation Consultants dba Freight Force injury rate improved

JV Transportation Consultants dba Freight Force's TCR fell 3.8 from 7.7 in 2017 to 3.9 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 8.2 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.59× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=7.7 · 2018=8.2 · 2019=3.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Elizabeth, NJ ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 6.6 · 114% of ind

  • DART 3.9 DART
  • RANK #262/333
  • PHOTO Federal Gateway Movi…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 25 inj
  • SIZE ~117 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Federal Gateway Moving and Storage LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

JV Transportation Consultants dba Freight Force in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows JV Transportation Consultants dba Freight Force averages 6.6 TCR (114% of the General Warehousing and Storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

JV Transportation Consultants dba Freight Force TCR series: 2017=7.7 · 2018=8.2 · 2019=3.9 · BLS 5.8

Where JV Transportation Consultants dba Freight Force falls in its industry

9,477 General Warehousing and Storag establishments

Safer than 21% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #262 safest of 333 General Warehousing and Storag employers in New Jersey.

JV Transportation Consultants dba Freight Force (117 employees, TCR 6.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate JV Transportation Consultants dba Freight Force
JV Transportation Consultants dba Freight Force (117 employees, TCR 6.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

JV Transportation Consultants dba Freight Force has more employees than the General Warehousing and Storage median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 3.9 3.9 3 0 0
2018 8.2 6.2 12 0 0
2017 7.7 3.1 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · NJ · Elizabeth

9,477 General Warehousing and Storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 145 employers in Elizabeth, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Federal Gateway Moving and Storage LLC 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Micro Fulfillment Center of Delilah Road 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Carver Logistics Center 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Penske : 5802-00 Toyota/Princeton, IN 6.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Joseph Jingoli & Son, Inc. 117 FTE
STATE-SIZE Long Branch, JFKS Facility 117 FTE
STATE-SIZE D03 North Jersey 117 FTE
STATE-SIZE C2 Imaging - Jersey City 117 FTE
CITY-NEAR AMZL : DEW2 2,770 FTE
CITY-NEAR Trinitas Regional Medical Center 2,376 FTE
CITY-NEAR APM Terminals 1,389 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maher Berth 64 1,041 FTE
NAT-TCR Happy Floors 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Ardagh Metal Packaging USA, Inc. - Conklin 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Hospital Couriers Florida (North) 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Husco - Maquoketa 6.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE U.S. Tsubaki Automotive, LLC - Portland, TN 117 FTE
NAT-SIZE LFA 117 FTE
NAT-SIZE PetersenDean Roofing Las Vegas 117 FTE
NAT-SIZE Crystal Pines Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center 117 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.