Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) · Rhode Island

KAC Logistics

East Greenwich, RI · ~54 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
15.0
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

KAC Logistics runs at 231% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) workplace, earning a grade F.

KAC Logistics: 15.0 TCR = 231% of Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS 6.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

KAC Logistics safety composite

KAC Logistics scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 14%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 15.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

DART rate
D 7.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−16.0

2023→2024

KAC Logistics injury rate improved

KAC Logistics's TCR fell 16.0 from 23.0 in 2023 to 7.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 23.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.47× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=23.0 · 2024=7.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492110 · East Greenwich, RI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 15.0 · 231% of ind

  • DART 7.0 DART
  • RANK #11/15
  • PHOTO Delivery Stop
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~54 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Delivery Stop (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Rhode Island employers → · Look up another →

KAC Logistics in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows KAC Logistics averages 15.0 TCR (231% of the Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

KAC Logistics TCR series: 2023=23 · 2024=7 · BLS 6.5

Where KAC Logistics falls in its industry

6,679 Courier services (i.e., interc establishments

Safer than 14% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Rhode Island alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 15 Courier services (i.e., interc employers in Rhode Island.

KAC Logistics (54 employees, TCR 15.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate KAC Logistics
KAC Logistics (54 employees, TCR 15.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0

KAC Logistics has fewer employees than the Courier services (i.e., intercity networ median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.0 7.0 4 0 0
2023 23.0 6.6 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492110 · RI · East Greenwich

6,679 Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,610 rated employers in Rhode Island with headcount on file · 26 employers in East Greenwich, RI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Delivery Stop 15.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fleet: Birmingham SDO 15.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Blue Box Logistics 15.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 3 Kings Express LLC 15.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Multiwall Packaging - Taylor 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tag Central Ave LLC 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Corporate Office 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE 117 West Woonsocket RI 54 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ocean State Veterinary Specialists 281 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Elizabeth Home 242 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dave's Fresh Marketplace of East Greenwich Square, Inc 224 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dave's Fresh Marketplace of East Greenwich 214 FTE
NAT-TCR City Hall 15.0 TCR
NAT-TCR SH Distributing 15.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Seal Ambulance 15.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Estancia Del Sol 15.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE CBSI Marshall 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Scotts Company - Linden 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sungwon Catonsville LLC 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Preferred Electrical Contractors, Inc. 54 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.