Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) · Michigan

Kalitta Turbines

Ypsilanti, MI · ~44 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.9
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Kalitta Turbines runs at 65% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) workplace, earning a grade B.

Kalitta Turbines: 2.9 TCR = 65% of Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) BLS 4.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Kalitta Turbines safety composite

Kalitta Turbines scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.8

2023→2024

Kalitta Turbines injury rate improved

Kalitta Turbines's TCR fell 5.8 from 5.8 in 2023 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 5.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=5.8 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488190 · Ypsilanti, MI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.9 · 65% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #7/20
  • PHOTO KORD, 166th Aviation…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~44 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: KORD, 166th Aviation Brigade (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Kalitta Turbines in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Kalitta Turbines averages 2.9 TCR (65% of the Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Kalitta Turbines TCR series: 2023=5.8 · 2024=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Kalitta Turbines falls in its industry

992 Aircraft maintenance and repai establishments

Safer than 53% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 20 Aircraft maintenance and repai employers in Michigan.

Kalitta Turbines (44 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Kalitta Turbines
Kalitta Turbines (44 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Kalitta Turbines has fewer employees than the Aircraft maintenance and repair services median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 5.8 5.8 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488190 · MI · Ypsilanti

992 Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 128 employers in Ypsilanti, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR KORD, 166th Aviation Brigade 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR SFS Des Moines-247DSM 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Signature Flight Support Trenton 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lockheed Martin Corporation Eglin AFB FL-1107 Luton Dr (3715/3742) 2.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE NW Planning & Design Center 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE SEMCO Energy Gas Company - Macomb 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Genesee County Water & Waste Services 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Anthony Ragnone Treatment Plant 44 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eastern Michigan University 3,706 FTE
CITY-NEAR RAWSONVILLE 679 FTE
CITY-NEAR Women's Huron Valley Correctional Facility 516 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eby-Brown Detroit 374 FTE
NAT-TCR Groot South 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Ritchie Engineering Company, Inc. 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Care One at Northampton 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR BorgWarner Ithaca LLC 2.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE ImagiCorps 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Action Gypsum Supply West Chino 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Southern Oklahoma Ambulance Service 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sweet Galilee at the Wigwam 44 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.