Engineering services · Georgia

Kalman & Company Inc - GA - DARD Warehouse

Albany, GA · ~51 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
3.4
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Kalman & Company Inc - GA - DARD Warehouse runs at 684% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Engineering services workplace, earning a grade F.

Kalman & Company Inc - GA - DARD Warehouse: 3.4 TCR = 684% of Engineering services BLS 0.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Kalman & Company Inc - GA - DARD Warehouse safety composite

Kalman & Company Inc - GA - DARD Warehouse scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 15%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.2

2019→2021

Kalman & Company Inc - GA - DARD Warehouse injury rate improved

Kalman & Company Inc - GA - DARD Warehouse's TCR fell 5.2 from 5.2 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2019 at 5.2 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=5.2 · 2020=5.0 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541330 · Albany, GA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 3.4 · 684% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #22/25
  • PHOTO Danieli Ashland Serv…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~51 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Danieli Ashland Service Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Kalman & Company Inc - GA - DARD Warehouse in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Kalman & Company Inc - GA - DARD Warehouse averages 3.4 TCR (684% of the Engineering services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Kalman & Company Inc - GA - DARD Warehouse TCR series: 2019=5.2 · 2020=5 · 2021=0 · BLS 0.5

Where Kalman & Company Inc - GA - DARD Warehouse falls in its industry

690 Engineering services establishments

Safer than 15% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #22 safest of 25 Engineering services employers in Georgia.

Kalman & Company Inc - GA - DARD Warehouse (51 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 112 employees and a TCR of 0.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Kalman & Company Inc - GA - DARD Warehouse
Kalman & Company Inc - GA - DARD Warehouse (51 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 112 employees and a TCR of 0.9

Kalman & Company Inc - GA - DARD Warehouse has fewer employees than the Engineering services median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 5.0 5.0 2 0 0
2019 5.2 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541330 · GA · Albany

690 Engineering services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 186 employers in Albany, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Danieli Ashland Service Center 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Concord Office 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR MARITIME APPLIED PHYSICS CORPORATION 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kalman & Company Inc - TX - Fort Worth 3.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Williams Produce, Inc. 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Corteva 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE THREE NOTCH ELECTRIC MEMBERSHIP CORPARATION 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE AGLC Peachtree Service Center 51 FTE
CITY-NEAR MetroPower Inc 691 FTE
CITY-NEAR Procter and Gamble Paper Products Company Albany Plant 644 FTE
CITY-NEAR MillerCoors Albany Brewery 550 FTE
CITY-NEAR Molson Coors 537 FTE
NAT-TCR Peninsular Pest Control Service, Inc. 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Newcomb Spring of TN 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR LGA-SPUSA 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Happy Valley Homewood Suites 3.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Noffsinger Manufacturing 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE HealthTrust Supply Chain - Delta Market 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Leader Printing - Chippewa Falls 08-12 WI 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Harris Rebar Nufab - Houston Texas 51 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.