Pallets, wood or wood and metal combination, manufacturing · Indiana

Kamps Indianapolis California St

Indianapolis, IN · ~32 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Kamps Indianapolis California St runs at 197% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Pallets, wood or wood and metal combination, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Kamps Indianapolis California St: 6.5 TCR = 197% of Pallets, wood or wood and metal combination, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Kamps Indianapolis California St safety composite

Kamps Indianapolis California St scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 55% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 48%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.8

2017→2021

Kamps Indianapolis California St injury rate improved

Kamps Indianapolis California St's TCR fell 4.8 from 10.4 in 2017 to 5.7 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2017 at 10.4 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.44× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=10.4 · 2018=6.0 · 2019=5.8 · 2020=4.5 · 2021=5.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 321920 · Indianapolis, IN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.5 · 197% of ind

  • DART 2.8 DART
  • RANK #20/31
  • PHOTO Kamps Lansing
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~32 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Kamps Lansing (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Kamps Indianapolis California St in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Kamps Indianapolis California St averages 6.5 TCR (197% of the Pallets, wood or wood and metal combination, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Kamps Indianapolis California St TCR series: 2017=10.4 · 2018=6 · 2019=5.8 · 2020=4.5 · 2021=5.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Kamps Indianapolis California St falls in its industry

952 Pallets, wood or wood and meta establishments

Safer than 48% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #20 safest of 31 Pallets, wood or wood and meta employers in Indiana.

Kamps Indianapolis California St (32 employees, TCR 6.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 6.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Kamps Indianapolis California St
Kamps Indianapolis California St (32 employees, TCR 6.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 6.3

Kamps Indianapolis California St has fewer employees than the Pallets, wood or wood and metal combinat median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 5.7 2.8 2 0 0
2020 4.5 2.3 2 0 0
2019 5.8 5.8 2 0 0
2018 6.0 3.0 2 0 0
2017 10.4 10.4 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

321920 · IN · Indianapolis

952 Pallets, wood or wood and metal combination, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 2,074 employers in Indianapolis, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Kamps Lansing 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pallet Repair Services 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Minneapolis,MN - 263 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR UFP Dallas 6.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE R. Gallagher Generating Station 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Aurora 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jasper County REMC Headquarters 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Indiana American Water-Northwest District Borman Park Water Treatment Plant 32 FTE
CITY-NEAR Indiana University Health, Inc 7,874 FTE
CITY-NEAR Methodist Hospital 6,862 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eli Lilly - Lilly Corp Center 6,482 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lilly Technology Center 6,472 FTE
NAT-TCR Eastern Contractor Services #845 6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR *EMCM Plaza Collegeville 6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Dept. of Health & Social Services (11) 6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Renaissance Phoenix Downtown 6.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Tidewater Carlsbad 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE St Paul 202 Snelling Ave - AB 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Drury Inn & Suites - Nashville Airport 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Drury Inn & Suites - Paducah 32 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.