Pallet containers, wood or wood and metal combination, manufacturing · Georgia

Kamps Pallets Atlanta Jonesboro

Atlanta, GA · ~119 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Kamps Pallets Atlanta Jonesboro runs at 138% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Pallet containers, wood or wood and metal combination, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Kamps Pallets Atlanta Jonesboro: 4.5 TCR = 138% of Pallet containers, wood or wood and metal combination, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Kamps Pallets Atlanta Jonesboro safety composite

Kamps Pallets Atlanta Jonesboro scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 67% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 38%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.4

2022→2024

Kamps Pallets Atlanta Jonesboro injury rate improved

Kamps Pallets Atlanta Jonesboro's TCR fell 3.4 from 7.8 in 2022 to 4.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 7.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.96× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=7.8 · 2023=1.5 · 2024=4.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 321920 · Atlanta, GA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.5 · 138% of ind

  • DART 4.4 DART
  • RANK #17/47
  • PHOTO Newport Pallet Inc,
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~119 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Newport Pallet Inc, (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Kamps Pallets Atlanta Jonesboro in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Kamps Pallets Atlanta Jonesboro averages 4.5 TCR (138% of the Pallet containers, wood or wood and metal combination, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Kamps Pallets Atlanta Jonesboro TCR series: 2022=7.8 · 2023=1.5 · 2024=4.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Kamps Pallets Atlanta Jonesboro falls in its industry

952 Pallet containers, wood or woo establishments

Safer than 67% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 47 Pallet containers, wood or woo employers in Georgia.

Kamps Pallets Atlanta Jonesboro (119 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 6.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Kamps Pallets Atlanta Jonesboro
Kamps Pallets Atlanta Jonesboro (119 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 6.3

Kamps Pallets Atlanta Jonesboro has more employees than the Pallet containers, wood or wood and meta median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.4 4.4 6 0 0
2023 1.5 1.5 2 0 0
2022 7.8 3.9 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

321920 · GA · Atlanta

952 Pallet containers, wood or wood and metal combination, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 1,907 employers in Atlanta, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Newport Pallet Inc, 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kamps Louisville 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Shade 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Recycled Henderson (USUD) 4.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Mann Mechanical 119 FTE
STATE-SIZE 060 Dublin 119 FTE
STATE-SIZE Terrapin Beer Company-Athens 119 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rohrer Corporation - Buford 119 FTE
CITY-NEAR Insight Global 20,586 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - ATL Airport 19,423 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - ATL- Airport 18,018 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northside 13,761 FTE
NAT-TCR Dickinson Frozen Foods 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Sow Grow Investments LLC, dba Lackless Logistics 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR City of Waterville 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Preco, LLC. Somerset 4.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Westmoor Mfg Co 119 FTE
NAT-SIZE Goya Foods Massachusetts 119 FTE
NAT-SIZE R & J Trucking Marietta Terminal 119 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jamestown Nd - 3324 119 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.