Building board (e.g., fiber, flake, particle) merchant wholesalers · Missouri

Kansas City Paxton

Kansas City, MO · ~32 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
5.3
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Kansas City Paxton runs at 241% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Building board (e.g., fiber, flake, particle) merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade F.

Kansas City Paxton: 5.3 TCR = 241% of Building board (e.g., fiber, flake, particle) merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Kansas City Paxton safety composite

Kansas City Paxton scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 33%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

39/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Kansas City Paxton: 12.7 → 8000.0 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 8000.0 TCR · DART/TCR 1509.43× in 2024

Kansas City Paxton's TCR rose 7987.3 from 12.7 in 2016 to 8000.0 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1509.43× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423310 · Kansas City, MO ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 5.3 · 241% of ind

  • DART 8000.0 DART
  • RANK #22/32
  • PHOTO Irving Lumber
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~32 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Irving Lumber (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

Kansas City Paxton in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Kansas City Paxton averages 5.3 TCR (241% of the Building board (e.g., fiber, flake, particle) merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Kansas City Paxton TCR series: 2016=12.7 · 2017=6.2 · 2019=6.6 · 2021=2.2 · 2022=0 · 2023=4 · 2024=8000 · BLS 2.2

Where Kansas City Paxton falls in its industry

1,225 Building board (e.g., fiber, f establishments

Safer than 38% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #22 safest of 32 Building board (e.g., fiber, f employers in Missouri.

Kansas City Paxton (32 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 41 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 020406080100120 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Kansas City Paxton
Kansas City Paxton (32 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 41 employees and a TCR of 4.2

Kansas City Paxton has fewer employees than the Building board (e.g., fiber, flake, part median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8000.0 8000.0 1 0 0
2023 4.0 4.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 2.2 1.4 2 4 0
2019 6.6 6.6 2 0 0
2017 6.2 6.2 2 0 0
2016 12.7 6.3 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423310 · MO · Kansas City

1,225 Building board (e.g., fiber, flake, particle) merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 1,023 employers in Kansas City, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Irving Lumber 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR C&B-Door Pro Houston TX 660 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR J1-Channahon 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dixie Plywood and Lumber Co. of San Antonio 5.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE PRINCETON CONTRACT PRODUCTION 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Atlantic Pork 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE RDF SW Missouri, LLC 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE CRB Builders, LLC - St. Louis Office 32 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mass Service Organization 11,859 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hallmark Cards Mass Channel 11,578 FTE
CITY-NEAR Global Merchandising Services (GMS) 9,548 FTE
CITY-NEAR Children's Mercy - Missouri 7,709 FTE
NAT-TCR 20th Avenue 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 1701 E. Kingsfield Rd. 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Cannon Tube Fabrication 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Auburn Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation 5.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Belmont Arthur Ave LDC 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Goodwill Oldsmar SS 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Alamo 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE NA-US-DE-Seaford-Ventura Drive 32 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.