Construction management, commercial and institutional building · Massachusetts

Kaplan Construction

Brookline, MA · ~32 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.8
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Kaplan Construction runs at 60% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Construction management, commercial and institutional building workplace, earning a grade B.

Kaplan Construction: 1.8 TCR = 60% of Construction management, commercial and institutional building BLS 2.9 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Kaplan Construction safety composite

Kaplan Construction scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.3

2016→2023

Kaplan Construction injury rate improved

Kaplan Construction's TCR fell 4.3 from 4.3 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 6.2 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.3 · 2017=3.5 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=6.2 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Brookline, MA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.8 · 60% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #42/100
  • PHOTO Iron Construction, I…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~32 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Iron Construction, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Kaplan Construction in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Kaplan Construction averages 1.8 TCR (60% of the Construction management, commercial and institutional building BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Kaplan Construction TCR series: 2016=4.3 · 2017=3.5 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=6.2 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 2.9

Where Kaplan Construction falls in its industry

4,692 Construction management, comme establishments

Safer than 60% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #42 safest of 100 Construction management, comme employers in Massachusetts.

Kaplan Construction (32 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Kaplan Construction
Kaplan Construction (32 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Kaplan Construction has fewer employees than the Construction management, commercial and median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 6.2 6.2 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 3.5 3.5 1 0 0
2016 4.3 4.3 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · MA · Brookline

4,692 Construction management, commercial and institutional building employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 22 employers in Brookline, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Iron Construction, Inc. 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Harper General Contractors, Inc. 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tavares LLC 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR JHL Constructors, Inc. 1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Gradiant Corp 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE FirstLight Power 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fore River Energy Center 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Williams Building Company, Inc. 32 FTE
CITY-NEAR Brookline - MA 202 FTE
CITY-NEAR Trader Joe's 0501 Brookline 185 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2576-20 170 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2576-020 168 FTE
NAT-TCR NuWeld, Inc. 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Kay Polymer Trucking Inc. 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR The Grand Residence at Upper St. Clair 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Rocky Coast Builders 1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Post Road 105 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Industrial Chemicals Corporation 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Winston Salem Terminal 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Valley Dairy Restaurant #8 32 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.