Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) · Missouri

KCP&L - Cedar Point Training Center

Kansas City, MO · ~39 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
1.0
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

KCP&L - Cedar Point Training Center runs at 83% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) workplace, earning a grade C.

KCP&L - Cedar Point Training Center: 1.0 TCR = 83% of Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS 1.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

KCP&L - Cedar Point Training Center safety composite

KCP&L - Cedar Point Training Center scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 0.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

KCP&L - Cedar Point Training Center held a steady TCR band

KCP&L - Cedar Point Training Center's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 3.0 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=3.0 · 2018=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Kansas City, MO AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 1.0 · 83% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #8/42
  • PHOTO Rhode Island State E…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~39 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Rhode Island State Energy Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

KCP&L - Cedar Point Training Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows KCP&L - Cedar Point Training Center averages 1.0 TCR (83% of the Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

KCP&L - Cedar Point Training Center TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=3 · 2018=0 · BLS 1.2

Where KCP&L - Cedar Point Training Center falls in its industry

846 Electric power generation, fos establishments

Safer than 66% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 42 Electric power generation, fos employers in Missouri.

KCP&L - Cedar Point Training Center (39 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate KCP&L - Cedar Point Training Center
KCP&L - Cedar Point Training Center (39 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

KCP&L - Cedar Point Training Center has fewer employees than the Electric power generation, fossil fuel ( median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 3.0 3.0 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · MO · Kansas City

846 Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 1,023 employers in Kansas City, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Rhode Island State Energy Center 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Plant Jack Watson 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 327-NiSource-West Terre Haute IN 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Colstrip Power Plant 1.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Select Genetics MO White Oak 006-0138-WG, WH, WT 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMEREN MISSOURI - Nuclear - Radiation Protection 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMEREN MISSOURI - Nuclear - Work Management 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE 8LC - Nuclear - Work Management 39 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mass Service Organization 11,859 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hallmark Cards Mass Channel 11,578 FTE
CITY-NEAR Global Merchandising Services (GMS) 9,548 FTE
CITY-NEAR Children's Mercy - Missouri 7,709 FTE
NAT-TCR Lexington Sheet Plant 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Plant Jack Watson 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Atrium Post Acute Care of Ellsworth 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 1004NC2 GoJet RDU Pilots 1.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE DePuy Synthes Development Ctr West Chester 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Des Moines Delaware Service Center 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE River Lodge and Grill 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Enterprise 45V3 39 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.