General merchandise, nondurable goods, merchant wholesalers · Georgia

Keefe Atlanta

Atlanta, GA · ~33 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
5.2
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Keefe Atlanta runs at 236% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical General merchandise, nondurable goods, merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade F.

Keefe Atlanta: 5.2 TCR = 236% of General merchandise, nondurable goods, merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Keefe Atlanta safety composite

Keefe Atlanta scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 27%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.8

2016→2024

Keefe Atlanta injury rate improved

Keefe Atlanta's TCR fell 5.8 from 5.8 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 11.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.8 · 2017=7.2 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=3.0 · 2020=7.2 · 2021=7.4 · 2022=11.8 · 2023=4.3 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 424990 · Atlanta, GA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 5.2 · 236% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #11/16
  • PHOTO Wensco Sign Supply
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~33 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Wensco Sign Supply (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Keefe Atlanta in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Keefe Atlanta averages 5.2 TCR (236% of the General merchandise, nondurable goods, merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Keefe Atlanta TCR series: 2016=5.8 · 2017=7.2 · 2018=0 · 2019=3 · 2020=7.2 · 2021=7.4 · 2022=11.8 · 2023=4.3 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.2

Where Keefe Atlanta falls in its industry

301 General merchandise, nondurabl establishments

Safer than 27% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 16 General merchandise, nondurabl employers in Georgia.

Keefe Atlanta (33 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Keefe Atlanta
Keefe Atlanta (33 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Keefe Atlanta has fewer employees than the General merchandise, nondurable goods, m median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 4.3 0.0 1 0 0
2022 11.8 11.8 1 0 0
2021 7.4 0.0 2 0 0
2020 7.2 7.2 1 1 0
2019 3.0 3.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 7.2 2.4 3 0 0
2016 5.8 5.8 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

424990 · GA · Atlanta

301 General merchandise, nondurable goods, merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 1,907 employers in Atlanta, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Wensco Sign Supply 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Central Baking Supplies 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Supply Source Enterprises-Richmond, IN 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR BSG West Warwick 5.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cairo 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pullet/Breeder Facility 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Farmers Gin & Peanut Co., Inc. 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE GRP Madison 33 FTE
CITY-NEAR Insight Global 20,586 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - ATL Airport 19,423 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - ATL- Airport 18,018 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northside 13,761 FTE
NAT-TCR Wilmington, Massachusetts Warehouse 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR NKY 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Northeast Rehabilitation Hospital Network 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR SHMG - Urgent Care Clinic & Occupational Medicine 5.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE 131 Lehigh 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE New Friends Memory and Residential Care of Florence 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE 036-CDR 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sanderson Farms Collins Feed Mill 33 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.