General merchandise, nondurable goods, merchant wholesalers · Missouri

Keefe Bridgeton

Bridgeton, MO · ~143 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.4
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Keefe Bridgeton runs at 290% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical General merchandise, nondurable goods, merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade F.

Keefe Bridgeton: 6.4 TCR = 290% of General merchandise, nondurable goods, merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Keefe Bridgeton safety composite

Keefe Bridgeton scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 21%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Keefe Bridgeton held a steady TCR band

Keefe Bridgeton's TCR held near 0.1 from 5.0 in 2016 to 4.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 52.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.0 · 2017=7.4 · 2018=16.7 · 2019=1.4 · 2020=4.8 · 2021=4.5 · 2022=6.2 · 2023=52.4 · 2024=4.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 424990 · Bridgeton, MO ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 6.4 · 290% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #13/13
  • PHOTO Salt Lake City
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 61 inj
  • SIZE ~143 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Salt Lake City (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

Keefe Bridgeton in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Keefe Bridgeton averages 6.4 TCR (290% of the General merchandise, nondurable goods, merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Keefe Bridgeton TCR series: 2016=5 · 2017=7.4 · 2018=16.7 · 2019=1.4 · 2020=4.8 · 2021=4.5 · 2022=6.2 · 2023=52.4 · 2024=4.9 · BLS 2.2

Where Keefe Bridgeton falls in its industry

301 General merchandise, nondurabl establishments

Safer than 21% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 13 General merchandise, nondurabl employers in Missouri.

Keefe Bridgeton (143 employees, TCR 6.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Keefe Bridgeton
Keefe Bridgeton (143 employees, TCR 6.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Keefe Bridgeton has more employees than the General merchandise, nondurable goods, m median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.9 0.0 5 0 0
2023 52.4 52.4 4 0 0
2022 6.2 6.2 9 0 0
2021 4.5 3.9 7 0 0
2020 4.8 2.9 5 0 0
2019 1.4 1.4 2 0 0
2018 16.7 10.3 13 0 0
2017 7.4 1.6 9 0 0
2016 5.0 4.3 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

424990 · MO · Bridgeton

301 General merchandise, nondurable goods, merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 131 employers in Bridgeton, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Salt Lake City 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Otto Brehm Inc 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Florida Food Service, Inc 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR JCL Solutions 6.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE International Paper Kansas City 143 FTE
STATE-SIZE Quaker Windows and Doors Wood Plant 143 FTE
STATE-SIZE UltraSource LLC 143 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wabtec Global Services Kansas City 143 FTE
CITY-NEAR DePaul Hospital - St. Louis 1,683 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hussmann Corporation- Bridgeton MFG 1,004 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hussmann Corporation - Bridgeton 802 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1188 404 FTE
NAT-TCR Wilsonville 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR South Coast #511 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Metro West Nursing and Rehab Center 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR The Waters of Clifty Falls 6.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Clinical Services 143 FTE
NAT-SIZE Musson Brothers Inc 143 FTE
NAT-SIZE Koedyker & Kenyon Construction, Inc. 143 FTE
NAT-SIZE Continental Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 143 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.