Air-conditioners, motor vehicle, manufacturing · Ohio

Keihin Thermal Technology of America

Mount Sterling, OH · ~533 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
6.3
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Keihin Thermal Technology of America runs at 116% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Air-conditioners, motor vehicle, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Keihin Thermal Technology of America: 6.3 TCR = 116% of Air-conditioners, motor vehicle, manufacturing BLS 5.4 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Keihin Thermal Technology of America safety composite

Keihin Thermal Technology of America scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

20/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

DART rate
F 12.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Keihin Thermal Technology of America: 6.5 → 12.9 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 12.9 TCR · DART/TCR 2.06× in 2021

Keihin Thermal Technology of America's TCR rose 6.5 from 6.5 in 2016 to 12.9 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 2.06× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336390 · Mount Sterling, OH ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 6.3 · 116% of ind

  • DART 12.9 DART
  • RANK #77/91
  • PHOTO SAF - Holland , Inc.
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 142 inj
  • SIZE ~533 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SAF - Holland , Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Keihin Thermal Technology of America in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Keihin Thermal Technology of America averages 6.3 TCR (116% of the Air-conditioners, motor vehicle, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Keihin Thermal Technology of America TCR series: 2016=6.5 · 2017=5.7 · 2018=4.8 · 2019=3.3 · 2020=4.5 · 2021=12.9 · BLS 5.4

Where Keihin Thermal Technology of America falls in its industry

772 Air-conditioners, motor vehicl establishments

Safer than 16% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #77 safest of 91 Air-conditioners, motor vehicl employers in Ohio.

Keihin Thermal Technology of America (533 employees, TCR 6.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 154 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Keihin Thermal Technology of America
Keihin Thermal Technology of America (533 employees, TCR 6.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 154 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Keihin Thermal Technology of America has more employees than the Air-conditioners, motor vehicle, manufac median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 12.9 12.9 4 0 0
2020 4.5 3.1 16 0 0
2019 3.3 2.7 15 1 0
2018 4.8 2.5 22 7 0
2017 5.7 3.7 36 5 0
2016 6.5 4.9 49 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336390 · OH · Mount Sterling

772 Air-conditioners, motor vehicle, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 4 employers in Mount Sterling, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SAF - Holland , Inc. 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Addictive Desert Designs 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chicago 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jacobs Vehicle Systems 6.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE 810 - Findlay DC 533 FTE
STATE-SIZE Deceuninck North America-Monroe 534 FTE
STATE-SIZE NorthStar BlueScope Steel 534 FTE
STATE-SIZE ARE Accessories LLC 532 FTE
CITY-NEAR MAHLE Behr Mt. Sterling Inc. 369 FTE
CITY-NEAR BST Co 31 FTE
CITY-NEAR Jay Car Construction Company, Inc. 20 FTE
NAT-TCR Wenner Bakery -Bayport Facility 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 42967 - Oak Forest Fac 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Elmer-Hugh Taylor Clinic 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Hinkle Insulation & Drywall #694 6.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Siskin 533 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hershey - Hazleton Plant 533 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ashley Furniture Inc. 533 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lease Crutcher Lewis WA, LLC 533 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.