Construction management, commercial and institutional building · New York

Kel-Tech Construction, Inc.

Queens, NY · ~328 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.3
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Kel-Tech Construction, Inc. runs at 253% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Construction management, commercial and institutional building workplace, earning a grade F.

Kel-Tech Construction, Inc.: 7.3 TCR = 253% of Construction management, commercial and institutional building BLS 2.9 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Kel-Tech Construction, Inc. safety composite

Kel-Tech Construction, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−10.2

2019→2021

Kel-Tech Construction, Inc. injury rate improved

Kel-Tech Construction, Inc.'s TCR fell 10.2 from 10.2 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 11.8 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=10.2 · 2020=11.8 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Queens, NY ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 7.3 · 253% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #200/218
  • PHOTO A&K Construction
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~328 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: A&K Construction (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Kel-Tech Construction, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Kel-Tech Construction, Inc. averages 7.3 TCR (253% of the Construction management, commercial and institutional building BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Kel-Tech Construction, Inc. TCR series: 2019=10.2 · 2020=11.8 · 2021=0 · BLS 2.9

Where Kel-Tech Construction, Inc. falls in its industry

4,692 Construction management, comme establishments

Safer than 11% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #200 safest of 218 Construction management, comme employers in New York.

Kel-Tech Construction, Inc. (328 employees, TCR 7.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Kel-Tech Construction, Inc.
Kel-Tech Construction, Inc. (328 employees, TCR 7.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Kel-Tech Construction, Inc. has more employees than the Construction management, commercial and median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 11.8 11.8 6 0 0
2019 10.2 10.2 16 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · NY · Queens

4,692 Construction management, commercial and institutional building employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 54 employers in Queens, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR A&K Construction 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR LM Construction Co LLC -Corporate Office 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1134 - BELFOR Wallingford CT 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mountain States Const. Co. 7.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE RC Structures 328 FTE
STATE-SIZE GKN Aerospace 328 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 2355 328 FTE
STATE-SIZE Center for Employment Opportunities Inc. 328 FTE
CITY-NEAR Skanska USA Civil Inc. 5,513 FTE
CITY-NEAR Resorts World Casino NYC 1,079 FTE
CITY-NEAR Residential Transition Support Program (RTS) 507 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cardinal Health 110, LLC (dba Kinray) 481 FTE
NAT-TCR 4Front Engineer Solutions- Muskego 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 281 Southwest 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Avamere Rehabilitation at Fiesta Park 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR San Antonio ITS 7.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Memorial Hospital Los Banos (200-LOSBAN) 328 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0690 - Laguna Marketplace Ca Whse 328 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0061 - Federal Way Wa Whse 328 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0013 - Silverdale Wa Whse 328 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.