Milk processing (e.g., bottling, homogenizing, pasteurizing, vitaminizing) manufacturing · Minnesota

Kemps Minneapolis Milk

Minneapolis, MN · ~143 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Kemps Minneapolis Milk runs at 276% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Milk processing (e.g., bottling, homogenizing, pasteurizing, vitaminizing) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Kemps Minneapolis Milk: 9.1 TCR = 276% of Milk processing (e.g., bottling, homogenizing, pasteurizing, vitaminizing) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Kemps Minneapolis Milk safety composite

Kemps Minneapolis Milk scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

23/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Kemps Minneapolis Milk: 8.6 → 10.5 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 10.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.79× in 2021

Kemps Minneapolis Milk's TCR rose 1.9 from 8.6 in 2017 to 10.5 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2019 at 10.8 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.79× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311511 · Minneapolis, MN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 9.1 · 276% of ind

  • DART 7.2 DART
  • RANK #14/18
  • PHOTO Sunshine State Dairy…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 52 inj
  • SIZE ~143 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sunshine State Dairy Farms, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Kemps Minneapolis Milk in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Kemps Minneapolis Milk averages 9.1 TCR (276% of the Milk processing (e.g., bottling, homogenizing, pasteurizing, vitaminizing) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Kemps Minneapolis Milk TCR series: 2017=8.6 · 2019=10.8 · 2020=6.6 · 2021=10.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Kemps Minneapolis Milk falls in its industry

457 Milk processing (e.g., bottlin establishments

Safer than 15% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 18 Milk processing (e.g., bottlin employers in Minnesota.

Kemps Minneapolis Milk (143 employees, TCR 9.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 140 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Kemps Minneapolis Milk
Kemps Minneapolis Milk (143 employees, TCR 9.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 140 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Kemps Minneapolis Milk has more employees than the Milk processing (e.g., bottling, homogen median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 10.5 7.2 16 0 0
2020 6.6 4.6 10 0 0
2019 10.8 7.9 15 0 0
2017 8.6 7.0 11 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311511 · MN · Minneapolis

457 Milk processing (e.g., bottling, homogenizing, pasteurizing, vitaminizing) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 1,321 employers in Minneapolis, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Sunshine State Dairy Farms, LLC 9.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6400-SWY-0045-0045-08403 9.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR DFA-OHD-PORTLAND ME-364 FOREST AVE 9.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6400-SWY 0045 8404 9.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Novel Energy Solutions L.L.C. 143 FTE
STATE-SIZE Electronic Communication Systems LLC 143 FTE
STATE-SIZE Weidner Plumbing and Heating Company 143 FTE
STATE-SIZE McC Corporate Office 143 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Minnesota Twin Cities 22,522 FTE
CITY-NEAR MN950 MN TELECOMMUTER 12,021 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0501 - City Center 8,459 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hennepin County Medical Center 7,030 FTE
NAT-TCR LGS Pace, LLC.-IN 9.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Valley View Farms 9.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Felderman Management Corp 9.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Penn Pallet Inc - Saint Marys 9.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Revolve Management Company LLC 143 FTE
NAT-SIZE AmTech, LLC 143 FTE
NAT-SIZE CI - West Union OH 143 FTE
NAT-SIZE Michigan Spring and Stamping of Muskegon 143 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.