Home nursing services, private practice · Michigan

Kent County Correctional Facility

Grand Rapids, MI · ~56 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Kent County Correctional Facility runs at 121% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Home nursing services, private practice workplace, earning a grade D.

Kent County Correctional Facility: 4.6 TCR = 121% of Home nursing services, private practice BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Kent County Correctional Facility safety composite

Kent County Correctional Facility scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 44%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.7

2016→2024

Kent County Correctional Facility injury rate improved

Kent County Correctional Facility's TCR fell 2.7 from 2.7 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 13.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.7 · 2022=13.5 · 2023=2.1 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621399 · Grand Rapids, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.6 · 121% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/6
  • PHOTO The Views of Marion
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~56 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Views of Marion (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Kent County Correctional Facility in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Kent County Correctional Facility averages 4.6 TCR (121% of the Home nursing services, private practice BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Kent County Correctional Facility TCR series: 2016=2.7 · 2022=13.5 · 2023=2.1 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Kent County Correctional Facility falls in its industry

111 Home nursing services, private establishments

Safer than 44% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 6 Home nursing services, private employers in Michigan.

Kent County Correctional Facility (56 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 87 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Kent County Correctional Facility
Kent County Correctional Facility (56 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 87 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Kent County Correctional Facility has fewer employees than the Home nursing services, private practice median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 2.1 0.0 1 0 0
2022 13.5 13.5 3 0 0
2016 2.7 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621399 · MI · Grand Rapids

111 Home nursing services, private practice employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 1,006 employers in Grand Rapids, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Views of Marion 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 208 Hurricane Lane 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR South Port Square Senior Living 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Berkley Manor Care Center 4.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE John B Schaendorf Dairy 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hamtramck Energy Services 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE A. Lindberg & Sons Inc. 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cipparrone Contracting Inc 56 FTE
CITY-NEAR SHHG-GR BUTTERWORTH CA 9,012 FTE
CITY-NEAR SH Butterworth Hospital 7,397 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Health Saint Mary's Hospital-MH-MI 2,914 FTE
CITY-NEAR Steelcase - Grand Rapids / Kentwood 2,817 FTE
NAT-TCR Tolleson AZ 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Esschem, Inc. 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Jade Engineered Plastics, Inc 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 000 County Courthouse 4.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cowtown Garden Acres Drive 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bedford Engineering 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ella S.A. Contracting, L.P. 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sonata Delray Beach 56 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.