Food, prepared, perishable, packaged for individual resale · Minnesota

Kent Precision Foods Group- Foley

Foley, MN · ~172 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.7
Avg TCR
4.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Kent Precision Foods Group- Foley runs at 67% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Food, prepared, perishable, packaged for individual resale workplace, earning a grade B.

Kent Precision Foods Group- Foley: 2.7 TCR = 67% of Food, prepared, perishable, packaged for individual resale BLS 4.1 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Kent Precision Foods Group- Foley safety composite

Kent Precision Foods Group- Foley scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 94% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 94% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.2

2019→2023

Kent Precision Foods Group- Foley injury rate improved

Kent Precision Foods Group- Foley's TCR fell 4.2 from 4.2 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2019 at 4.2 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=4.2 · 2020=3.0 · 2021=2.3 · 2022=4.2 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311991 · Foley, MN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.7 · 67% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/9
  • PHOTO JTM Food Group
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 23 inj
  • SIZE ~172 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: JTM Food Group (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Kent Precision Foods Group- Foley in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Kent Precision Foods Group- Foley averages 2.7 TCR (67% of the Food, prepared, perishable, packaged for individual resale BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Kent Precision Foods Group- Foley TCR series: 2019=4.2 · 2020=3 · 2021=2.3 · 2022=4.2 · 2023=0 · BLS 4.1

Where Kent Precision Foods Group- Foley falls in its industry

376 Food, prepared, perishable, pa establishments

Safer than 74% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 9 Food, prepared, perishable, pa employers in Minnesota.

Kent Precision Foods Group- Foley (172 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 179 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Kent Precision Foods Group- Foley
Kent Precision Foods Group- Foley (172 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 179 employees and a TCR of 5.1

Kent Precision Foods Group- Foley has fewer employees than the Food, prepared, perishable, packaged for median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 4.2 0.8 4 1 0
2021 2.3 2.3 3 0 0
2020 3.0 2.1 5 2 0
2019 4.2 2.7 11 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311991 · MN · Foley

376 Food, prepared, perishable, packaged for individual resale employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 17 employers in Foley, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR JTM Food Group 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Land O'Lakes - Hicksville, NY 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Produce Innovations 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Misionero 2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Agropur Inc. - Le Sueur Cheese 172 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rosenbauer Motors LLC 172 FTE
STATE-SIZE St. Paul, MN 172 FTE
STATE-SIZE NORTH AMERICAN COMPOSITES COMPANY 172 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Gardens at Foley 123 FTE
CITY-NEAR Benton County - Human Services 108 FTE
CITY-NEAR High School 96 FTE
CITY-NEAR Intermediate 95 FTE
NAT-TCR 951WDM 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Kern Masonry Structures, Inc. 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Elm Crest Manor 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Westmont College 2.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Norris Rods 172 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0265 - Monroe Township Nj (Wet) Depot 172 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fiesta # 09 172 FTE
NAT-SIZE North Village Park 172 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.