Pipe tobacco, prepared, manufacturing · Kentucky

Kentucky BioProcessing

Owensboro, KY · ~37 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Kentucky BioProcessing runs at 52% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Pipe tobacco, prepared, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Kentucky BioProcessing: 1.7 TCR = 52% of Pipe tobacco, prepared, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Kentucky BioProcessing safety composite

Kentucky BioProcessing scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 85% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Kentucky BioProcessing held a steady TCR band

Kentucky BioProcessing's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 3.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=2.9 · 2018=3.3 · 2019=3.7 · 2020=3.5 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=2.3 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 312230 · Owensboro, KY AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.7 · 52% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/4
  • PHOTO Gallatin Redrying an…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~37 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Gallatin Redrying and Storage Company (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Kentucky employers → · Look up another →

Kentucky BioProcessing in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Kentucky BioProcessing averages 1.7 TCR (52% of the Pipe tobacco, prepared, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Kentucky BioProcessing TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=2.9 · 2018=3.3 · 2019=3.7 · 2020=3.5 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=2.3 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Kentucky BioProcessing falls in its industry

53 Pipe tobacco, prepared, manufa establishments

Safer than 64% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Kentucky alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 4 Pipe tobacco, prepared, manufa employers in Kentucky.

Kentucky BioProcessing (37 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 153 employees and a TCR of 2.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Kentucky BioProcessing
Kentucky BioProcessing (37 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 153 employees and a TCR of 2.1

Kentucky BioProcessing has fewer employees than the Pipe tobacco, prepared, manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 2.3 2.3 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 3.5 3.5 1 0 0
2019 3.7 0.0 0 1 0
2018 3.3 0.0 0 1 0
2017 2.9 2.9 0 1 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

312230 · KY · Owensboro

53 Pipe tobacco, prepared, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,805 rated employers in Kentucky with headcount on file · 184 employers in Owensboro, KY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Gallatin Redrying and Storage Company 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tobaccoville Manufacturing 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hail & Cotton, LLC 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR R.C. Owen Company 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Big Rivers Electric Corporation - ET&S 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE CW Assemblies LLC 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2850 RUSSELLVILLE BOWLING GREEN KY 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ontrac Inc Dba Blitz Builders Inc 37 FTE
CITY-NEAR Owensboro Health Regional Hospital 2,305 FTE
CITY-NEAR Owensboro Public Schools 969 FTE
CITY-NEAR Owensboro Independent 903 FTE
CITY-NEAR Swedish Match 816 FTE
NAT-TCR RIE Coatings, LLC Eden Valley 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Staco Energy Products 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR First Warren Corporation 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR CenterPoint Energy - Noblesville 1.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE BC Supply 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Johnny Rockets #241 Excalibur 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Finis 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nick's Welding & Fabricating Hixton 37 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.