Air passenger carriers, scheduled · Alaska

Ketchikan Alaska CS

Ketchikan, AK · ~56 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.6
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ketchikan Alaska CS runs at 148% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Air passenger carriers, scheduled workplace, earning a grade D.

Ketchikan Alaska CS: 6.6 TCR = 148% of Air passenger carriers, scheduled BLS 4.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ketchikan Alaska CS safety composite

Ketchikan Alaska CS scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 46%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−10.1

2016→2024

Ketchikan Alaska CS injury rate improved

Ketchikan Alaska CS's TCR fell 10.1 from 16.8 in 2016 to 6.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 16.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.67× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=16.8 · 2017=11.4 · 2018=2.3 · 2019=13.3 · 2020=2.5 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=2.2 · 2023=4.5 · 2024=6.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 481111 · Ketchikan, AK ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.6 · 148% of ind

  • DART 4.5 DART
  • RANK #14/21
  • PHOTO SW-20730213-IF PHX -…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 25 inj
  • SIZE ~56 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SW-20730213-IF PHX - PHOENIX, AZ (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alaska employers → · Look up another →

Ketchikan Alaska CS in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ketchikan Alaska CS averages 6.6 TCR (148% of the Air passenger carriers, scheduled BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ketchikan Alaska CS TCR series: 2016=16.8 · 2017=11.4 · 2018=2.3 · 2019=13.3 · 2020=2.5 · 2021=0 · 2022=2.2 · 2023=4.5 · 2024=6.7 · BLS 4.5

Where Ketchikan Alaska CS falls in its industry

1,568 Air passenger carriers, schedu establishments

Safer than 46% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alaska alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 21 Air passenger carriers, schedu employers in Alaska.

Ketchikan Alaska CS (56 employees, TCR 6.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 6.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Ketchikan Alaska CS
Ketchikan Alaska CS (56 employees, TCR 6.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 6.1

Ketchikan Alaska CS has fewer employees than the Air passenger carriers, scheduled median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.7 4.5 3 0 0
2023 4.5 4.5 2 0 0
2022 2.2 2.2 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 2.5 2.5 1 0 0
2019 13.3 10.7 5 0 0
2018 2.3 2.3 1 0 0
2017 11.4 4.5 5 0 0
2016 16.8 16.8 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

481111 · AK · Ketchikan

1,568 Air passenger carriers, scheduled employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,558 rated employers in Alaska with headcount on file · 34 employers in Ketchikan, AK · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SW-20730213-IF PHX - PHOENIX, AZ 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4795-EA-SMF-SACRAMENTO-SMF-TRML 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Allegiant Air FNT 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2073-SW-20730045-IF 6.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Samson Electric Anchorage 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE MATSON NAVIGATION COMPANY OF ALASKA LLC KODIAK 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tram-AK 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE FedEx 1550 RESSEL AVENUE 56 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ketchikan Medical Center 488 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dept. of Transportation & Public Facilities (85) 389 FTE
CITY-NEAR Vigor Industrial 144 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2710 139 FTE
NAT-TCR Elmhurst 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Sagebrush Sales 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 1 Bethesda Drive Operating Company LLC 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Fitzpatrick Mfg. Co. 6.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Absolute Machine Tools, Inc. 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Milton - BMD 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Montgomery Place Nursing Center 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Des Plaines Yard 140 56 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.