Bridge construction · Pennsylvania

Kevin E. Raker Construction, LLC.

Sunbury, PA · ~23 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.7
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Kevin E. Raker Construction, LLC. runs at 310% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Bridge construction workplace, earning a grade F.

Kevin E. Raker Construction, LLC.: 8.7 TCR = 310% of Bridge construction BLS 2.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Kevin E. Raker Construction, LLC. safety composite

Kevin E. Raker Construction, LLC. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 8%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

21/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−16.1

2016→2022

Kevin E. Raker Construction, LLC. injury rate improved

Kevin E. Raker Construction, LLC.'s TCR fell 16.1 from 23.7 in 2016 to 7.6 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2016 at 23.7 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.87× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=23.7 · 2017=3.9 · 2018=4.4 · 2019=9.9 · 2020=11.3 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=7.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237310 · Sunbury, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.7 · 310% of ind

  • DART 7.6 DART
  • RANK #178/196
  • PHOTO Hammonasset Construc…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hammonasset Construction LLC. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Kevin E. Raker Construction, LLC. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Kevin E. Raker Construction, LLC. averages 8.7 TCR (310% of the Bridge construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Kevin E. Raker Construction, LLC. TCR series: 2016=23.7 · 2017=3.9 · 2018=4.4 · 2019=9.9 · 2020=11.3 · 2021=0 · 2022=7.6 · BLS 2.8

Where Kevin E. Raker Construction, LLC. falls in its industry

4,078 Bridge construction establishments

Safer than 12% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #178 safest of 196 Bridge construction employers in Pennsylvania.

Kevin E. Raker Construction, LLC. (23 employees, TCR 8.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Kevin E. Raker Construction, LLC.
Kevin E. Raker Construction, LLC. (23 employees, TCR 8.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Kevin E. Raker Construction, LLC. has fewer employees than the Bridge construction median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 7.6 7.6 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 11.3 5.6 2 0 0
2019 9.9 5.0 2 0 0
2018 4.4 0.0 1 0 0
2017 3.9 0.0 1 0 0
2016 23.7 17.8 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237310 · PA · Sunbury

4,078 Bridge construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 35 employers in Sunbury, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hammonasset Construction LLC. 8.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR SPS/Walsh JV 8.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Midway 8.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR PW-Transportation Operations 8.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Mt. Parnell Fisheries Co. 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hickory Run Energy, LLC 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE CPV Fairview LLC 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Valley Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc. - Corporate Office 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR 251 507 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sunbury Textile Mills, Inc. 194 FTE
CITY-NEAR 36 144 FTE
CITY-NEAR UPMC Susquehanna Sunbury 123 FTE
NAT-TCR PMW - Frankfort 8.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Stop & Shop 100725 8.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Custom Coating, Inc. 8.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Maple Hill Sow 2745 -Est 8.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Municipio Las Marias (Manejo De Emergencias) 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brookdale Senior Living 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Southeast Construction Company, LLC. 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Marion Manufacturing, Inc. 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.