Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · New York

Kew Gardens

Kew Gardens, NY · ~112 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Kew Gardens runs at 281% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Kew Gardens: 10.7 TCR = 281% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Kew Gardens safety composite

Kew Gardens scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 65% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 27%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 65% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−9.0

2016→2022

Kew Gardens injury rate improved

Kew Gardens's TCR fell 9.0 from 13.9 in 2016 to 4.9 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 16.4 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.12× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=13.9 · 2017=8.5 · 2019=8.0 · 2020=12.4 · 2021=16.4 · 2022=4.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Kew Gardens, NY ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 10.7 · 281% of ind

  • DART 1.2 DART
  • RANK #219/283
  • PHOTO Hawthorne Woods by N…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 36 inj
  • SIZE ~112 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hawthorne Woods by New Perspective (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Kew Gardens in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Kew Gardens averages 10.7 TCR (281% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Kew Gardens TCR series: 2016=13.9 · 2017=8.5 · 2019=8 · 2020=12.4 · 2021=16.4 · 2022=4.9 · BLS 3.8

Where Kew Gardens falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 27% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #219 safest of 283 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in New York.

Kew Gardens (112 employees, TCR 10.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Kew Gardens
Kew Gardens (112 employees, TCR 10.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Kew Gardens has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 4.9 1.2 4 0 0
2021 16.4 13.8 2 11 0
2020 12.4 11.3 2 9 0
2019 8.0 4.5 7 0 0
2017 8.5 4.3 8 0 0
2016 13.9 9.6 13 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · NY · Kew Gardens

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 7 employers in Kew Gardens, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hawthorne Woods by New Perspective 10.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 10002 10.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR BRIDGEPATH 10.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2248-63123 10.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Beak & Skiff Apple Farms, Inc. 112 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mamais Contracting Corp 112 FTE
STATE-SIZE Structural Services of New York 112 FTE
STATE-SIZE 7207_16529 112 FTE
CITY-NEAR 10312 92 FTE
CITY-NEAR 80-02 Kew Gardens Road 33 FTE
CITY-NEAR New York 30 FTE
CITY-NEAR KEW GARDENS_1368964 28 FTE
NAT-TCR 4795-Aa-Fll-Fort Lauderdale-Fll-Trm1 10.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 5472-NAI-0034-0034-03719 10.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Superior Grocers #129 10.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Chateau De Boise 10.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Liberty Nursing Center of Mansfield 112 FTE
NAT-SIZE USM Store #527 112 FTE
NAT-SIZE Austin 1420 112 FTE
NAT-SIZE Central Oklahoma 112 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.