Refrigeration system (e.g., commercial, industrial, scientific) installation · Oregon

Key Mechanical Oregon

Portland, OR · ~40 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.7
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Key Mechanical Oregon runs at 95% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Refrigeration system (e.g., commercial, industrial, scientific) installation workplace, earning a grade C.

Key Mechanical Oregon: 2.7 TCR = 95% of Refrigeration system (e.g., commercial, industrial, scientific) installation BLS 2.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Key Mechanical Oregon safety composite

Key Mechanical Oregon scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−10.5

2017→2021

Key Mechanical Oregon injury rate improved

Key Mechanical Oregon's TCR fell 10.5 from 10.5 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2017 at 10.5 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=10.5 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=2.8 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238220 · Portland, OR AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.7 · 95% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #24/86
  • PHOTO 0F86 - INDIANAPOLIS …
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~40 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 0F86 - INDIANAPOLIS FIRE (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Key Mechanical Oregon in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Key Mechanical Oregon averages 2.7 TCR (95% of the Refrigeration system (e.g., commercial, industrial, scientific) installation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Key Mechanical Oregon TCR series: 2017=10.5 · 2018=0 · 2019=2.8 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Key Mechanical Oregon falls in its industry

5,793 Refrigeration system (e.g., co establishments

Safer than 58% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #24 safest of 86 Refrigeration system (e.g., co employers in Oregon.

Key Mechanical Oregon (40 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Key Mechanical Oregon
Key Mechanical Oregon (40 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Key Mechanical Oregon has fewer employees than the Refrigeration system (e.g., commercial, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.8 2.8 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 10.5 10.5 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238220 · OR · Portland

5,793 Refrigeration system (e.g., commercial, industrial, scientific) installation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 1,728 employers in Portland, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 0F86 - INDIANAPOLIS FIRE 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Spectrum Air Conditioning & Refrigeration 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Middleton Heat and Air 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR OLIVER SPRINKLER CO INC 2.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Hazel Dell Orchard, LLC 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Avitas Oregon Holdings 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE PRT Hubbard 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Clatskanie People's Utility District 40 FTE
CITY-NEAR OHSU Main Campus 18,003 FTE
CITY-NEAR OR349 PROVIDENCE ST VINCENT MEDICAL CTR-PORTLA 4,033 FTE
CITY-NEAR OR346 PROVIDENCE PORTLAND MEDICAL CTR-PORTLAND 3,684 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2252-00000530 3,498 FTE
NAT-TCR Wesco Aircraft - GS Savannah Site 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Johnson School Bus Inc. 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR San Antonio CSC and San Ant Hospitals 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Chicago Operation 2.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Landscape 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sun Chemical Corp 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Avamere at Lexington 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Harsco Butler 40 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.