Commercial refrigeration equipment repair and maintenance services · Michigan

keyes refrigeration inc

Grand Rapids, MI · ~27 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.5
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

keyes refrigeration inc runs at 499% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Commercial refrigeration equipment repair and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade F.

keyes refrigeration inc: 10.5 TCR = 499% of Commercial refrigeration equipment repair and maintenance services BLS 2.1 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

keyes refrigeration inc safety composite

keyes refrigeration inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

16/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.52 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−11.3

2016→2019

keyes refrigeration inc injury rate improved

keyes refrigeration inc's TCR fell 11.3 from 17.9 in 2016 to 6.5 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2016 at 17.9 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.62× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=17.9 · 2018=7.0 · 2019=6.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · Grand Rapids, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.5 · 499% of ind

  • DART 6.5 DART
  • RANK #114/114
  • PHOTO Sav Prosperity Drive…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~27 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sav Prosperity Drive Depot (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

keyes refrigeration inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows keyes refrigeration inc averages 10.5 TCR (499% of the Commercial refrigeration equipment repair and maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

keyes refrigeration inc TCR series: 2016=17.9 · 2018=7 · 2019=6.5 · BLS 2.1

Where keyes refrigeration inc falls in its industry

2,560 Commercial refrigeration equip establishments

Safer than 3% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #114 safest of 114 Commercial refrigeration equip employers in Michigan.

keyes refrigeration inc (27 employees, TCR 10.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate keyes refrigeration inc
keyes refrigeration inc (27 employees, TCR 10.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

keyes refrigeration inc has fewer employees than the Commercial refrigeration equipment repai median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 6.5 6.5 2 0 0
2018 7.0 7.0 2 0 0
2016 17.9 7.1 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · MI · Grand Rapids

2,560 Commercial refrigeration equipment repair and maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 1,006 employers in Grand Rapids, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Sav Prosperity Drive Depot 10.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amherst 10.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR FESCO 10.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR TLT-Turbo Inc. 10.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Badger Evergreen Nursery LLC 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE K Drive Greenhouse Co 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Masterpiece Flower Company LLC - Merchandising (MO) 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Luurtsema Sales Inc. 27 FTE
CITY-NEAR SHHG-GR BUTTERWORTH CA 9,012 FTE
CITY-NEAR SH Butterworth Hospital 7,397 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Health Saint Mary's Hospital-MH-MI 2,914 FTE
CITY-NEAR Steelcase - Grand Rapids / Kentwood 2,817 FTE
NAT-TCR Carpet Cleaning & Water Restoration 10.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Pahio at Kauai beach Villas Interval Owners Association 10.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Amzl : Djx1 10.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Ray Day Jr. Logging, Inc. 10.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Dallas Synnex 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4300 Windfern Drive Suite 400 Houston TX 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE 649 Eaton Belmond 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE 484 Caterpillar LL - East Peoria IL 27 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.