Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) · Pennsylvania

Keystone Generating Station

Shelocta, PA · ~152 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Keystone Generating Station runs at 51% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) workplace, earning a grade B.

Keystone Generating Station: 0.6 TCR = 51% of Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS 1.2 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Keystone Generating Station safety composite

Keystone Generating Station scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

71/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.0

2016→2024

Keystone Generating Station injury rate improved

Keystone Generating Station's TCR fell 1.0 from 1.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 1.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.0 · 2018=0.5 · 2019=0.6 · 2020=0.6 · 2021=0.0 · 2023=1.6 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Shelocta, PA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 0.6 · 51% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #7/46
  • PHOTO 00601 MERWIN HYDRO P…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~152 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 00601 MERWIN HYDRO PLNT (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Keystone Generating Station in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Keystone Generating Station averages 0.6 TCR (51% of the Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Keystone Generating Station TCR series: 2016=1 · 2018=0.5 · 2019=0.6 · 2020=0.6 · 2021=0 · 2023=1.6 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Keystone Generating Station falls in its industry

846 Electric power generation, fos establishments

Safer than 83% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 46 Electric power generation, fos employers in Pennsylvania.

Keystone Generating Station (152 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Keystone Generating Station
Keystone Generating Station (152 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Keystone Generating Station has more employees than the Electric power generation, fossil fuel ( median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 1.6 0.0 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.6 0.0 1 0 0
2019 0.6 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.5 0.5 1 0 0
2016 1.0 0.5 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · PA · Shelocta

846 Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 5 employers in Shelocta, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 00601 MERWIN HYDRO PLNT 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Belews Creek Steam Station 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Entergy Choctaw County Generation Station 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dan E Karn 3&4 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE NB-Oliver Health Care Packaging 152 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Electric Materials Company 152 FTE
STATE-SIZE Keystone Powdered Metal - Lewis Run 152 FTE
STATE-SIZE Keystone Powdered Metal Company Lewis Run, PA 152 FTE
CITY-NEAR West Penn Energy Services 64 FTE
CITY-NEAR West Penn Heavy Haul 42 FTE
CITY-NEAR MJ Pipeline, Inc. 32 FTE
CITY-NEAR BrandSafway Industries LLC - Keystone Power Station-Shelocta 20 FTE
NAT-TCR Unit Pack Co., Inc. 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR R. E. Purvis and Associates, Inc. 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR HDS Pods 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR KEI Electrical Construction and Maintenance, Inc. 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Consolidated Metal Products 152 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dura-Line 152 FTE
NAT-SIZE Banko Overhead Doors, Inc 152 FTE
NAT-SIZE Denton 152 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.