Assembly plants, passenger car, on chassis of own manufacture · Georgia

KIA Georgia, Inc.

West Point, GA · ~2,756 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

KIA Georgia, Inc. runs at 59% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Assembly plants, passenger car, on chassis of own manufacture workplace, earning a grade B.

KIA Georgia, Inc.: 2.0 TCR = 59% of Assembly plants, passenger car, on chassis of own manufacture BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

KIA Georgia, Inc. safety composite

KIA Georgia, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.6

2021→2024

KIA Georgia, Inc. injury rate improved

KIA Georgia, Inc.'s TCR fell 0.6 from 2.1 in 2021 to 1.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 2.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.44× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=2.1 · 2022=2.9 · 2023=1.4 · 2024=1.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336111 · West Point, GA AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 59% of ind

  • DART 0.9 DART
  • RANK #3/8
  • PHOTO Volvo Car US Operati…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 191 inj
  • SIZE ~2,756 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Volvo Car US Operations/Ridgeville, SC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

KIA Georgia, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows KIA Georgia, Inc. averages 2.0 TCR (59% of the Assembly plants, passenger car, on chassis of own manufacture BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

KIA Georgia, Inc. TCR series: 2021=2.1 · 2022=2.9 · 2023=1.4 · 2024=1.5 · BLS 3.3

Where KIA Georgia, Inc. falls in its industry

158 Assembly plants, passenger car establishments

Safer than 75% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 8 Assembly plants, passenger car employers in Georgia.

KIA Georgia, Inc. (2,756 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 366 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05,00010,00015,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate KIA Georgia, Inc.
KIA Georgia, Inc. (2,756 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 366 employees and a TCR of 4.4

KIA Georgia, Inc. has more employees than the Assembly plants, passenger car, on chass median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.5 0.9 41 2 0
2023 1.4 1.0 39 0 0
2022 2.9 2.2 73 11 0
2021 2.1 1.5 38 9 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336111 · GA · West Point

158 Assembly plants, passenger car, on chassis of own manufacture employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 24 employers in West Point, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Volvo Car US Operations/Ridgeville, SC 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Advanced Technology Development Center 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR BMW of Manhattan 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Electric Vehicle Assembly Plant (EVAP) 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Floyd Medical Center 2,748 FTE
STATE-SIZE SKBA 2,745 FTE
STATE-SIZE Floyd Healthcare Management Inc 2,741 FTE
STATE-SIZE Saint Joseph's Hospital - EHC 2,729 FTE
CITY-NEAR WEST POINT 9,165 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hyundai MOBIS, LLC - Georgia Plant 5,436 FTE
CITY-NEAR KIA Motors Manufacturing Georgia, Inc. 2,392 FTE
CITY-NEAR GLOVIS AMERICA WP 629 FTE
NAT-TCR S03941 - Temple RDF 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR The James White Construction Company 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR AriesInd 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR T. Marzetti Company 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - CAE1 2,755 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2001 Rankin Road 2,758 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tobyhanna Army Depot 2,759 FTE
NAT-SIZE Highland Hospital 2,752 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.