Machine bases, metal, manufacturing · Indiana

Kimball Electronics Fabrication

Indianapolis, IN · ~104 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Kimball Electronics Fabrication runs at 35% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Machine bases, metal, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Kimball Electronics Fabrication: 1.1 TCR = 35% of Machine bases, metal, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Kimball Electronics Fabrication safety composite

Kimball Electronics Fabrication scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 90% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 41%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.15 per 100 workers

Safer than 90% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Kimball Electronics Fabrication: 0.0 → 2.4 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 3.1 TCR · DART/TCR 2.1× in 2021

Kimball Electronics Fabrication's TCR rose 2.4 from 0.0 in 2017 to 2.4 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2019 at 3.1 TCR. In 2021, DART was 2.1× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332999 · Indianapolis, IN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 35% of ind

  • DART 2.4 DART
  • RANK #1/47
  • PHOTO TESTRITE HOLDINGS, LLC
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~104 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: TESTRITE HOLDINGS, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Kimball Electronics Fabrication in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Kimball Electronics Fabrication averages 1.1 TCR (35% of the Machine bases, metal, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Kimball Electronics Fabrication TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0.2 · 2019=3.1 · 2020=0 · 2021=2.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Kimball Electronics Fabrication falls in its industry

827 Machine bases, metal, manufact establishments

Safer than 90% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 47 Machine bases, metal, manufact employers in Indiana.

Kimball Electronics Fabrication (104 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Kimball Electronics Fabrication
Kimball Electronics Fabrication (104 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Kimball Electronics Fabrication has more employees than the Machine bases, metal, manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 2.4 2.4 1 1 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 3.1 3.1 2 0 0
2018 0.2 0.2 2 1 0
2017 0.0 0.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332999 · IN · Indianapolis

827 Machine bases, metal, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 2,074 employers in Indianapolis, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR TESTRITE HOLDINGS, LLC 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dexter Magnetic Technologies 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR US572: Cope Philadelphia 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Felbro, Inc. 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Worthington - US - Production 104 FTE
STATE-SIZE Muncie Service Center 104 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pangere 104 FTE
STATE-SIZE Native Hardwoods 104 FTE
CITY-NEAR Indiana University Health, Inc 7,874 FTE
CITY-NEAR Methodist Hospital 6,862 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eli Lilly - Lilly Corp Center 6,482 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lilly Technology Center 6,472 FTE
NAT-TCR Little Falls Public School District-Community 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR S08382 - Commerce Sales Office 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Dot Transportation, Inc- TN 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Creamer Environmenntal, Inc. 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pmg Opco-Colonial LLC 104 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sutter Care at Home (247-SCRZ) 104 FTE
NAT-SIZE 7801-ENPHG-VMI 104 FTE
NAT-SIZE Drury Development Corporation 104 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.