Locomotive and rail car repair (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) · Minnesota

Kimball Railcar Services

Kimball, MN · ~21 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
8.6
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Kimball Railcar Services runs at 191% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Locomotive and rail car repair (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) workplace, earning a grade D.

Kimball Railcar Services: 8.6 TCR = 191% of Locomotive and rail car repair (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) BLS 4.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Kimball Railcar Services safety composite

Kimball Railcar Services scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

17/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Kimball Railcar Services: 12.1 → 19.4 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 19.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.75× in 2024

Kimball Railcar Services's TCR rose 7.3 from 12.1 in 2017 to 19.4 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.75× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488210 · Kimball, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 8.6 · 191% of ind

  • DART 6.5 DART
  • RANK #7/7
  • PHOTO Atchison
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~21 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Atchison (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Kimball Railcar Services in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Kimball Railcar Services averages 8.6 TCR (191% of the Locomotive and rail car repair (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Kimball Railcar Services TCR series: 2017=12.1 · 2018=4.3 · 2019=10.8 · 2020=5.1 · 2021=5.3 · 2022=5.7 · 2023=6.2 · 2024=19.4 · BLS 4.5

Where Kimball Railcar Services falls in its industry

409 Locomotive and rail car repair establishments

Safer than 5% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 7 Locomotive and rail car repair employers in Minnesota.

Kimball Railcar Services (21 employees, TCR 8.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 2.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Kimball Railcar Services
Kimball Railcar Services (21 employees, TCR 8.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 2.8

Kimball Railcar Services has fewer employees than the Locomotive and rail car repair (except f median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 19.4 6.5 3 0 0
2023 6.2 6.2 1 0 0
2022 5.7 5.7 1 0 0
2021 5.3 0.0 1 0 0
2020 5.1 0.0 1 0 0
2019 10.8 10.8 2 0 0
2018 4.3 4.3 1 0 0
2017 12.1 12.1 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488210 · MN · Kimball

409 Locomotive and rail car repair (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 9 employers in Kimball, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Atchison 8.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Union Tank Car Co. - Valdosta Plant 8.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Osawatomie 8.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Louisiana 8.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Winthrop Agronomy 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Donahues Greenhouse 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE M7 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE MNLOG-SEL-SEL MN LOGISTICS' 21 FTE
CITY-NEAR High School 60 FTE
CITY-NEAR Elementary 54 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kuechle Underground Inc 45 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Kimball 41 FTE
NAT-TCR W. A. Wilson & Sons, Inc. 8.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Owensboro 076 8.6 TCR
NAT-TCR El Toro Water District 8.6 TCR
NAT-TCR CHAKM - Hampton Inn Kimball 8.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE D3 Ottawa Yard 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE D6 Litchfield Yard 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE D8 Belleville Yard 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE D1 Kennedy Yard 21 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.