Paper (except newsprint, uncoated groundwood) products made in paper mills · Alabama

Kimberly-Clark Mobile Mill

Mobile, AL · ~588 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Kimberly-Clark Mobile Mill runs at 16% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Paper (except newsprint, uncoated groundwood) products made in paper mills workplace, earning a grade A.

Kimberly-Clark Mobile Mill: 0.5 TCR = 16% of Paper (except newsprint, uncoated groundwood) products made in paper mills BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Kimberly-Clark Mobile Mill safety composite

Kimberly-Clark Mobile Mill scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 94% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 94% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Kimberly-Clark Mobile Mill held a steady TCR band

Kimberly-Clark Mobile Mill's TCR held near 0.3 from 0.8 in 2016 to 0.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 0.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.59× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.8 · 2017=0.8 · 2018=0.1 · 2019=0.9 · 2020=0.1 · 2021=0.6 · 2022=0.9 · 2023=0.2 · 2024=0.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322121 · Mobile, AL AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 16% of ind

  • DART 0.3 DART
  • RANK #1/7
  • PHOTO Sappi Paper Allentown
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~588 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sappi Paper Allentown (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

Kimberly-Clark Mobile Mill in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Kimberly-Clark Mobile Mill averages 0.5 TCR (16% of the Paper (except newsprint, uncoated groundwood) products made in paper mills BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Kimberly-Clark Mobile Mill TCR series: 2016=0.8 · 2017=0.8 · 2018=0.1 · 2019=0.9 · 2020=0.1 · 2021=0.6 · 2022=0.9 · 2023=0.2 · 2024=0.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Kimberly-Clark Mobile Mill falls in its industry

317 Paper (except newsprint, uncoa establishments

Safer than 94% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 7 Paper (except newsprint, uncoa employers in Alabama.

Kimberly-Clark Mobile Mill (588 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 146 employees and a TCR of 2.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Kimberly-Clark Mobile Mill
Kimberly-Clark Mobile Mill (588 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 146 employees and a TCR of 2.2

Kimberly-Clark Mobile Mill has more employees than the Paper (except newsprint, uncoated ground median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.5 0.3 3 0 0
2023 0.2 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.9 0.6 6 0 0
2021 0.6 0.0 2 2 0
2020 0.1 0.0 0 1 0
2019 0.9 0.0 0 6 0
2018 0.1 0.0 0 1 0
2017 0.8 0.5 3 2 0
2016 0.8 0.3 2 3 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322121 · AL · Mobile

317 Paper (except newsprint, uncoated groundwood) products made in paper mills employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 505 employers in Mobile, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Sappi Paper Allentown 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ashdown 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ticonderoga Mill 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Port Huron 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Satellites Unlimited, LLC 587 FTE
STATE-SIZE Renfro - Ft. Payne Plant 587 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4701-722 589 FTE
STATE-SIZE Decatur West 586 FTE
CITY-NEAR MOBILE PACKERS 8,650 FTE
CITY-NEAR Austal USA LLC 3,377 FTE
CITY-NEAR MOBILE INFIRMARY 2,116 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hargrove Engineers and Constructors 1,949 FTE
NAT-TCR Vcf 091 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Reman Drivetrain Facility 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Vcf 019 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Urban Development 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Beverly Hills Hotel 588 FTE
NAT-SIZE Battle Creek Michigan Mill 588 FTE
NAT-SIZE Monticello High School 588 FTE
NAT-SIZE Center Line PDC 588 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.