Food (i.e., groceries) stores · Pennsylvania

Kimberton Whole Foods Collegeville

Collegeville, PA · ~50 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.1
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Kimberton Whole Foods Collegeville runs at 209% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Food (i.e., groceries) stores workplace, earning a grade F.

Kimberton Whole Foods Collegeville: 7.1 TCR = 209% of Food (i.e., groceries) stores BLS 3.4 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Kimberton Whole Foods Collegeville safety composite

Kimberton Whole Foods Collegeville scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 10%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

26/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Kimberton Whole Foods Collegeville: 0.0 → 9.6 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 13.0 TCR · DART/TCR 1.34× in 2024

Kimberton Whole Foods Collegeville's TCR rose 9.6 from 0.0 in 2019 to 9.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 13.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.34× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 445110 · Collegeville, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.1 · 209% of ind

  • DART 9.6 DART
  • RANK #994/1287
  • PHOTO VEGA BAJA
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~50 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: VEGA BAJA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Kimberton Whole Foods Collegeville in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Kimberton Whole Foods Collegeville averages 7.1 TCR (209% of the Food (i.e., groceries) stores BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Kimberton Whole Foods Collegeville TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=7.6 · 2021=6.7 · 2022=5.8 · 2023=13 · 2024=9.6 · BLS 3.4

Where Kimberton Whole Foods Collegeville falls in its industry

30,654 Food (i.e., groceries) stores establishments

Safer than 25% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #994 safest of 1287 Food (i.e., groceries) stores employers in Pennsylvania.

Kimberton Whole Foods Collegeville (50 employees, TCR 7.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Kimberton Whole Foods Collegeville
Kimberton Whole Foods Collegeville (50 employees, TCR 7.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Kimberton Whole Foods Collegeville has fewer employees than the Food (i.e., groceries) stores median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 9.6 9.6 4 0 0
2023 13.0 13.0 5 0 0
2022 5.8 2.9 2 0 0
2021 6.7 6.7 2 0 0
2020 7.6 0.0 2 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

445110 · PA · Collegeville

30,654 Food (i.e., groceries) stores employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 49 employers in Collegeville, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR VEGA BAJA 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dragon Star Supermarket 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Superior Grocers 113 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR GIANT FOOD STORES 6511 7.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE To-Jo Food Products Inc. 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kulp Family Dairy LLC 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Maronda Homes Inc of Pennsylvania 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Home Remodeling Pros of Central PA 50 FTE
CITY-NEAR GSKUPP 2,039 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pfizer Collegeville 1,839 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Dow Chemical Company - Collegeville, PA 649 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wegmans Collegeville 043 489 FTE
NAT-TCR Brilex Industries, Inc P2 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Dragon Star Supermarket 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR CL Industries 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Trollhaugen Ski Area 7.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE 36 Lincoln Avenue 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE 45 Crossways Parks Drive 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE YS1 ProTechnologies Inc 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Student Transit, Richmond, IN 50 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.