Sheet, plastics, unlaminated (except packaging), manufacturing · Georgia

Kimoto Tech, Inc

Cedartown, GA · ~40 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Kimoto Tech, Inc runs at 218% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Sheet, plastics, unlaminated (except packaging), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Kimoto Tech, Inc: 7.2 TCR = 218% of Sheet, plastics, unlaminated (except packaging), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Kimoto Tech, Inc safety composite

Kimoto Tech, Inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

23/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Kimoto Tech, Inc: 8.3 → 13.3 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 15.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.62× in 2024

Kimoto Tech, Inc's TCR rose 5.1 from 8.3 in 2016 to 13.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 15.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.62× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326113 · Cedartown, GA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.2 · 218% of ind

  • DART 4.5 DART
  • RANK #13/13
  • PHOTO Perpetual Recycling …
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~40 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Perpetual Recycling Solutions (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Kimoto Tech, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Kimoto Tech, Inc averages 7.2 TCR (218% of the Sheet, plastics, unlaminated (except packaging), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Kimoto Tech, Inc TCR series: 2016=8.3 · 2017=6.3 · 2018=6 · 2019=4.7 · 2020=15.8 · 2021=0 · 2022=10.1 · 2023=0 · 2024=13.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Kimoto Tech, Inc falls in its industry

303 Sheet, plastics, unlaminated ( establishments

Safer than 13% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 13 Sheet, plastics, unlaminated ( employers in Georgia.

Kimoto Tech, Inc (40 employees, TCR 7.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 98 employees and a TCR of 2.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Kimoto Tech, Inc
Kimoto Tech, Inc (40 employees, TCR 7.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 98 employees and a TCR of 2.9

Kimoto Tech, Inc has fewer employees than the Sheet, plastics, unlaminated (except pac median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 13.3 4.5 3 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 10.1 0.0 3 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 15.8 9.5 3 2 0
2019 4.7 2.3 2 0 0
2018 6.0 2.0 3 0 0
2017 6.3 4.2 3 0 0
2016 8.3 4.1 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326113 · GA · Cedartown

303 Sheet, plastics, unlaminated (except packaging), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 25 employers in Cedartown, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Perpetual Recycling Solutions 7.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Perfect Shutters, Inc. 7.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Agru America Andrews 1 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ridge Corporation Frazeysburg 7.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Eagle Grove Farms 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Unlimited Contract Services - Hoboken, GA 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Southeastern Gin Inc 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Coffee Co Gin County Inc 40 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cedartown 552 FTE
CITY-NEAR CDTWGAAN 287 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 727 243 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cedar Valley Nursing & Rehab Center 218 FTE
NAT-TCR Atlas Vineyard Management 7.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Energy Exchanger Company 7.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Mt Clifton Fruit Company 7.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Holiday Fl 7.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Key Home Health Care 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Reliable Ducts Heating and Cooling 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Katz Americas South 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nick's Towing Service 40 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.