Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) · Texas

Kimpton Harper

Fort Worth, TX · ~90 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
3.8
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Kimpton Harper runs at 126% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) workplace, earning a grade D.

Kimpton Harper: 3.8 TCR = 126% of Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) BLS 3.0 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Kimpton Harper safety composite

Kimpton Harper scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 61% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.1

2021→2024

Kimpton Harper injury rate improved

Kimpton Harper's TCR fell 2.1 from 5.2 in 2021 to 3.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 5.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.27× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=5.2 · 2022=5.7 · 2023=1.1 · 2024=3.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 721110 · Fort Worth, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 3.8 · 126% of ind

  • DART 1.0 DART
  • RANK #266/642
  • PHOTO IHG Army Hotels - Fo…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~90 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: IHG Army Hotels - Fort Jackson (Holiday Inn Express/Army Lodging) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Kimpton Harper in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Kimpton Harper averages 3.8 TCR (126% of the Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Kimpton Harper TCR series: 2021=5.2 · 2022=5.7 · 2023=1.1 · 2024=3.1 · BLS 3.0

Where Kimpton Harper falls in its industry

9,342 Hotel management services (i.e establishments

Safer than 61% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #266 safest of 642 Hotel management services (i.e employers in Texas.

Kimpton Harper (90 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Kimpton Harper
Kimpton Harper (90 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8

Kimpton Harper has more employees than the Hotel management services (i.e., providi median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.1 1.0 3 0 0
2023 1.1 0.0 1 0 0
2022 5.7 4.3 4 0 0
2021 5.2 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

721110 · TX · Fort Worth

9,342 Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 1,346 employers in Fort Worth, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR IHG Army Hotels - Fort Jackson (Holiday Inn Express/Army Lodging) 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 119 Hilton Garden Inn 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR RIVER ROAD HOSPITALITY ASSOCIATES, LLC 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hanks 3.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Chase Pecan, LP 90 FTE
STATE-SIZE Yates Field 90 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bridgeport Plant 90 FTE
STATE-SIZE Oklaunion Plant 90 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation US TX Fort Worth Lockheed Blvd (1093) 16,547 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation Fort Worth Campus (1093) 13,805 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cook Children's Medical Center 4,998 FTE
CITY-NEAR TX- Fort Worth 4,667 FTE
NAT-TCR Lake Manassas SNF LLC 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR BayCare Laboratories LLC (0016) 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 295 - Franklin 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Top Advantage Surfaces 3.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Mission Mechanical Corp 90 FTE
NAT-SIZE TEC Electric 90 FTE
NAT-SIZE Elite Metal Decking of South Florida 90 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pratt Retail Specialties, LLC Allentown,PA 90 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.