Information management computer systems integration design services · Washington

Kinc County Information Technology

Seattle, WA · ~498 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Kinc County Information Technology runs at 148% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Information management computer systems integration design services workplace, earning a grade D.

Kinc County Information Technology: 0.7 TCR = 148% of Information management computer systems integration design services BLS 0.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Kinc County Information Technology safety composite

Kinc County Information Technology scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 14%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

29/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 0.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

DART rate
F 0.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Kinc County Information Technology held a steady TCR band

Kinc County Information Technology's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.8 in 2019 to 0.7 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 0.8 TCR. In 2020, DART was 1× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=0.8 · 2020=0.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541512 · Seattle, WA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 0.7 · 148% of ind

  • DART 0.7 DART
  • RANK #4/5
  • PHOTO Link Solutions, Inc
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~498 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Link Solutions, Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Kinc County Information Technology in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Kinc County Information Technology averages 0.7 TCR (148% of the Information management computer systems integration design services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Kinc County Information Technology TCR series: 2019=0.8 · 2020=0.7 · BLS 0.5

Where Kinc County Information Technology falls in its industry

181 Information management compute establishments

Safer than 30% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 5 Information management compute employers in Washington.

Kinc County Information Technology (498 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 292 employees and a TCR of 0.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 012345 Average employees Total Case Rate Kinc County Information Technology
Kinc County Information Technology (498 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 292 employees and a TCR of 0.3

Kinc County Information Technology has more employees than the Information management computer systems median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.7 0.7 1 2 0
2019 0.8 0.8 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541512 · WA · Seattle

181 Information management computer systems integration design services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 1,279 employers in Seattle, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Link Solutions, Inc 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cart.com - Dallas 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Santa Clara 01 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Firelake Construction, Inc. 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Shell Oil Products US - Puget Sound Refinery 498 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ply Gem Windows - Auburn 498 FTE
STATE-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - BFI8 497 FTE
STATE-SIZE Samaritan Hospital 497 FTE
CITY-NEAR UW Seattle 32,378 FTE
CITY-NEAR The United States of America 25,000 FTE
CITY-NEAR Starz Entertainment 25,000 FTE
CITY-NEAR UW Medical Center - Montlake and NW 11,307 FTE
NAT-TCR HES San Antonio Field Camp 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Los Angeles Office 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Tunica Roadhouse Casino & Hotel 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR New York Corporate Office 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cti Foods 498 FTE
NAT-SIZE BISSELL Homecare, Inc. 498 FTE
NAT-SIZE Silverado Resort & Spa 498 FTE
NAT-SIZE Aspen Products - Kansas City 498 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.