Concrete product (e.g., structural precast, structural prestressed) installation · California

Kindness General Contractors

Cypress, CA · ~134 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
3.4
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Kindness General Contractors runs at 123% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Concrete product (e.g., structural precast, structural prestressed) installation workplace, earning a grade D.

Kindness General Contractors: 3.4 TCR = 123% of Concrete product (e.g., structural precast, structural prestressed) installation BLS 2.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Kindness General Contractors safety composite

Kindness General Contractors scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 56% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 39%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Kindness General Contractors held a steady TCR band

Kindness General Contractors's TCR held near 0.3 from 3.6 in 2017 to 3.3 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2017 at 3.6 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.77× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=3.6 · 2021=3.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238120 · Cypress, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 3.4 · 123% of ind

  • DART 2.6 DART
  • RANK #37/96
  • PHOTO LR WILLSON & SONS, I…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~134 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: LR WILLSON & SONS, INC. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Kindness General Contractors in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Kindness General Contractors averages 3.4 TCR (123% of the Concrete product (e.g., structural precast, structural prestressed) installation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Kindness General Contractors TCR series: 2017=3.6 · 2021=3.3 · BLS 2.8

Where Kindness General Contractors falls in its industry

705 Concrete product (e.g., struct establishments

Safer than 56% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #37 safest of 96 Concrete product (e.g., struct employers in California.

Kindness General Contractors (134 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Kindness General Contractors
Kindness General Contractors (134 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Kindness General Contractors has more employees than the Concrete product (e.g., structural preca median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 3.3 2.6 5 0 0
2017 3.6 2.1 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238120 · CA · Cypress

705 Concrete product (e.g., structural precast, structural prestressed) installation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 65 employers in Cypress, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR LR WILLSON & SONS, INC. 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Industrial Construction Specialists, LLC 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Morey Industries, Inc. 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR High Plains Steel Services, LLC 3.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE ag land inc 134 FTE
STATE-SIZE Capstone Ranch 134 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nissen Vineyard Services Inc. 134 FTE
STATE-SIZE H & C Ag, Inc. 134 FTE
CITY-NEAR B2B Staffing Services Inc 433 FTE
CITY-NEAR Yamaha Motor Corporation, USA - Cypress 365 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0748 - CYPRESS CA WHSE 363 FTE
CITY-NEAR Los Angeles CA Branch 342 FTE
NAT-TCR Neiman Marcus - Las Colinas 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Del Papa Distributing - NE 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Custer Plant 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Whealdon Estates 3.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Store #018 134 FTE
NAT-SIZE Greif Austell Mill 1 134 FTE
NAT-SIZE K056-M001 134 FTE
NAT-SIZE San Antonio CSC and San Ant Hospitals 134 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.