Process piping installation · Maryland

Kinetic Systems Inc. Mid-Alantic office - Shop MD

Frederick, MD · ~36 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Kinetic Systems Inc. Mid-Alantic office - Shop MD runs at 16% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Process piping installation workplace, earning a grade A.

Kinetic Systems Inc. Mid-Alantic office - Shop MD: 0.5 TCR = 16% of Process piping installation BLS 2.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Kinetic Systems Inc. Mid-Alantic office - Shop MD safety composite

Kinetic Systems Inc. Mid-Alantic office - Shop MD scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 97% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 97% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Kinetic Systems Inc. Mid-Alantic office - Shop MD: 0.0 → 2.3 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 2.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Kinetic Systems Inc. Mid-Alantic office - Shop MD's TCR rose 2.3 from 0.0 in 2019 to 2.3 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238220 · Frederick, MD AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 16% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/121
  • PHOTO W.H. Mechanical Cont…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~36 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: W.H. Mechanical Contracting, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Kinetic Systems Inc. Mid-Alantic office - Shop MD in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Kinetic Systems Inc. Mid-Alantic office - Shop MD averages 0.5 TCR (16% of the Process piping installation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Kinetic Systems Inc. Mid-Alantic office - Shop MD TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=2.3 · BLS 2.8

Where Kinetic Systems Inc. Mid-Alantic office - Shop MD falls in its industry

5,793 Process piping installation establishments

Safer than 97% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 121 Process piping installation employers in Maryland.

Kinetic Systems Inc. Mid-Alantic office - Shop MD (36 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Kinetic Systems Inc. Mid-Alantic office - Shop MD
Kinetic Systems Inc. Mid-Alantic office - Shop MD (36 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Kinetic Systems Inc. Mid-Alantic office - Shop MD has fewer employees than the Process piping installation median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.3 0.0 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238220 · MD · Frederick

5,793 Process piping installation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 267 employers in Frederick, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR W.H. Mechanical Contracting, LLC 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Harrell Fish Incorporated 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR BKI - Georgia Main Branch 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Southland NorCal Office 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE ForwardGro, LLC 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE R.W. Sauder Inc. 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gibraltar Construction Co., Inc. 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE BOB BREEDING GENERAL CONTRACTORS, LLC 36 FTE
CITY-NEAR MD-03 4,250 FTE
CITY-NEAR AstraZeneca Frederick Manufacturing Center 775 FTE
CITY-NEAR AstraZeneca Frederick Manufacturing 711 FTE
CITY-NEAR Thermo Fisher Scientific Frederick, MD (BID - Executive Way) 568 FTE
NAT-TCR Clay's Performance Construction LLC 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Jackson Demolition Service, Inc 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Andress Engineering Associates, Inc 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 3269 - South Beach 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bushman Equipment 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Espina Paving, Inc. 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Houston P Facility 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Preble Hill Farms LLC 36 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.