Addition, alteration and renovation general contractors, commercial and institutional building · Iowa

King Construction Cedar Rapids

Cedar Rapids, IA · ~20 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
20.2
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

King Construction Cedar Rapids runs at 697% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Addition, alteration and renovation general contractors, commercial and institutional building workplace, earning a grade F.

King Construction Cedar Rapids: 20.2 TCR = 697% of Addition, alteration and renovation general contractors, commercial and institutional building BLS 2.9 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

King Construction Cedar Rapids safety composite

King Construction Cedar Rapids scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

13/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 20.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

DART rate
F 10.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

King Construction Cedar Rapids: 18.5 → 21.9 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 21.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.54× in 2023

King Construction Cedar Rapids's TCR rose 3.4 from 18.5 in 2022 to 21.9 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 0.54× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Cedar Rapids, IA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 20.2 · 697% of ind

  • DART 10.9 DART
  • RANK #73/75
  • PHOTO Twin Cities Specialt…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~20 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Twin Cities Specialties Inc. (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Iowa employers → · Look up another →

King Construction Cedar Rapids in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows King Construction Cedar Rapids averages 20.2 TCR (697% of the Addition, alteration and renovation general contractors, commercial and institutional building BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

King Construction Cedar Rapids TCR series: 2022=18.5 · 2023=21.9 · BLS 2.9

Where King Construction Cedar Rapids falls in its industry

4,692 Addition, alteration and renov establishments

Safer than 0% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Iowa alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #73 safest of 75 Addition, alteration and renov employers in Iowa.

King Construction Cedar Rapids (20 employees, TCR 20.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate King Construction Cedar Rapids
King Construction Cedar Rapids (20 employees, TCR 20.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

King Construction Cedar Rapids has fewer employees than the Addition, alteration and renovation gene median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 21.9 10.9 6 0 0
2022 18.5 18.5 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · IA · Cedar Rapids

4,692 Addition, alteration and renovation general contractors, commercial and institutional building employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,192 rated employers in Iowa with headcount on file · 466 employers in Cedar Rapids, IA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Twin Cities Specialties Inc. 20.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR BK Welding, Inc 20.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jones & Roberts Co 20.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Equity Builders, Inc 20.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Skyline Pork, LLC 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE J-Six Farms Iowa 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Handlos Jacksonville 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Newell Pig II 20 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rockwell Collins (Cedar Rapids IA 400 NE) 6,179 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rockwell Collins - Cedar Rapids C Ave 6,172 FTE
CITY-NEAR CRST EXPEDITED INC 3,475 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Luke's Methodist Hospital 2,949 FTE
NAT-TCR 230424-Bal-Raspeburg Sta 20.2 TCR
NAT-TCR D & K construction, LLC 20.2 TCR
NAT-TCR St. Ignatius Nursing & Rehab Center 20.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Santa Ana 5 20.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Questek Mfg Corp 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gregory Poole Lift Systems- Harrisonburg 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE SCL Warehouse 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kerrs Creek AHQ 20 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.