Skilled nursing facilities · New York

King David Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation

Brooklyn, NY · ~305 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
5.9
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

King David Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation runs at 91% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade C.

King David Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation: 5.9 TCR = 91% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

King David Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation safety composite

King David Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 56% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 5.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

King David Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation held a steady TCR band

King David Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation's TCR held near 0.2 from 5.4 in 2019 to 5.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 7.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.89× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=5.4 · 2020=5.0 · 2022=6.4 · 2023=7.4 · 2024=5.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Brooklyn, NY AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 5.9 · 91% of ind

  • DART 5.3 DART
  • RANK #319/616
  • PHOTO Orchard Ridge Center
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 69 inj
  • SIZE ~305 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Orchard Ridge Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

King David Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows King David Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation averages 5.9 TCR (91% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

King David Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation TCR series: 2019=5.4 · 2020=5 · 2022=6.4 · 2023=7.4 · 2024=5.3 · BLS 6.5

Where King David Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 56% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #319 safest of 616 Skilled nursing facilities employers in New York.

King David Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation (305 employees, TCR 5.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate King David Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation
King David Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation (305 employees, TCR 5.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

King David Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation has more employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.3 5.3 13 0 0
2023 7.4 7.4 18 0 0
2022 6.4 3.9 15 0 0
2020 5.0 4.1 11 0 0
2019 5.4 5.4 12 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · NY · Brooklyn

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 941 employers in Brooklyn, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Orchard Ridge Center 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Alden Estates of Barrington 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brownsburg Health Care Center 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Heritage Health Care 5.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE 71021 305 FTE
STATE-SIZE Autumnview Health Care Facility 305 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 2286 305 FTE
STATE-SIZE 151 Burrs Lane 305 FTE
CITY-NEAR EDI - Brooklyn 946 9,270 FTE
CITY-NEAR S & A Unified Home Care, Inc. 7,782 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maimonides Medical Center 6,641 FTE
CITY-NEAR NYU Langone Hospital - Brooklyn 5,690 FTE
NAT-TCR National Distribution Centers LLC-15913 Mountain Ave. 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 1594 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Cemplex Group Florida, LLC 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Dare County 5.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE ORBIS Oconomowoc 305 FTE
NAT-SIZE Compact Industries, Inc 305 FTE
NAT-SIZE Saint-Gobain 305 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wolfgang Operations LLC - LGV 305 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.