Flour mills, cereals grains (except breakfast cereals, rice) · Michigan

King Milling Company

Lowell, MI · ~58 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

King Milling Company runs at 72% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Flour mills, cereals grains (except breakfast cereals, rice) workplace, earning a grade B.

King Milling Company: 2.4 TCR = 72% of Flour mills, cereals grains (except breakfast cereals, rice) BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

King Milling Company safety composite

King Milling Company scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 67% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

King Milling Company held a steady TCR band

King Milling Company's TCR held near 0.2 from 3.5 in 2016 to 3.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 6.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.7× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.5 · 2017=1.5 · 2018=6.2 · 2019=5.2 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=1.8 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=3.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311211 · Lowell, MI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.4 · 72% of ind

  • DART 1.7 DART
  • RANK #1/10
  • PHOTO Bob's Red Mill Natur…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~58 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Bob's Red Mill Natural Foods (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

King Milling Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows King Milling Company averages 2.4 TCR (72% of the Flour mills, cereals grains (except breakfast cereals, rice) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

King Milling Company TCR series: 2016=3.5 · 2017=1.5 · 2018=6.2 · 2019=5.2 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=1.8 · 2023=0 · 2024=3.3 · BLS 3.3

Where King Milling Company falls in its industry

209 Flour mills, cereals grains (e establishments

Safer than 67% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 10 Flour mills, cereals grains (e employers in Michigan.

King Milling Company (58 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate King Milling Company
King Milling Company (58 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 3.3

King Milling Company has more employees than the Flour mills, cereals grains (except brea median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.3 1.7 2 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 1.8 1.8 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 5.2 5.2 0 3 0
2018 6.2 4.7 4 0 0
2017 1.5 1.5 1 0 0
2016 3.5 1.8 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311211 · MI · Lowell

209 Flour mills, cereals grains (except breakfast cereals, rice) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 32 employers in Lowell, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Bob's Red Mill Natural Foods 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bartlett Milling Company, L.P. (CFM) 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bay State Milling Platteville 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Star of the West Milling Company - Churchville, NY 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Masterpiece Flower Company LLC - Merchandising (WI) 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE NTBS Services 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE River Rouge Power Plant 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cherryland Electric Cooperative 58 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lowell Area Schools 420 FTE
CITY-NEAR Litehouse Inc. - Lowell 373 FTE
CITY-NEAR Litehouse Foods Inc 320 FTE
CITY-NEAR 205 - Lowell 273 FTE
NAT-TCR Dan Williams Company 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Colorado Springs Winnelson Supply 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Community Action Agency of Columbiana County 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR CMP - Farmington Service Building 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Siouxland Machine, Inc 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hudson Company of Tennessee (Home Office) 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trucare Living Centers - Columbus 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Elyria 58 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.