Firefighting (except forest), government and volunteer (except private) · Arizona

Kingman Fire Department Station 24

Kingman, AZ · ~22 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.3
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Kingman Fire Department Station 24 runs at 71% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Firefighting (except forest), government and volunteer (except private) workplace, earning a grade B.

Kingman Fire Department Station 24: 2.3 TCR = 71% of Firefighting (except forest), government and volunteer (except private) BLS 3.2 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Kingman Fire Department Station 24 safety composite

Kingman Fire Department Station 24 scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 93% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

71/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 2.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 93% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Kingman Fire Department Station 24: 0.0 → 2.7 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 5.3 TCR · DART/TCR 1.17× in 2024

Kingman Fire Department Station 24's TCR rose 2.7 from 0.0 in 2019 to 2.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 5.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.17× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 922160 · Kingman, AZ AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.3 · 71% of ind

  • DART 2.7 DART
  • RANK #3/20
  • PHOTO Kaunakakai Station
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~22 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Kaunakakai Station (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Kingman Fire Department Station 24 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Kingman Fire Department Station 24 averages 2.3 TCR (71% of the Firefighting (except forest), government and volunteer (except private) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Kingman Fire Department Station 24 TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=5.3 · 2021=2.7 · 2022=0 · 2023=2.9 · 2024=2.7 · BLS 3.2

Where Kingman Fire Department Station 24 falls in its industry

793 Firefighting (except forest), establishments

Safer than 93% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 9.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 20 Firefighting (except forest), employers in Arizona.

Kingman Fire Department Station 24 (22 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 9.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Kingman Fire Department Station 24
Kingman Fire Department Station 24 (22 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 9.8

Kingman Fire Department Station 24 has fewer employees than the Firefighting (except forest), government median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 9.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.7 2.7 1 0 0
2023 2.9 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 2.7 2.7 1 0 0
2020 5.3 0.0 0 2 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

922160 · AZ · Kingman

793 Firefighting (except forest), government and volunteer (except private) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 135 employers in Kingman, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Kaunakakai Station 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR City Of Clarksville Fire Dept 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Village of Northfield 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR MS Fire Protection Inc 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Lehi Farm 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Trulieve - El Mirage 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Stanfield Farm 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kammann & Son Farms LLC 22 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kingman Healthcare Inc. 1,939 FTE
CITY-NEAR American Woodmark Coorporation, Kingman AZ Plant 568 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2051 508 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2051 448 FTE
NAT-TCR Yebo Group LLC 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Woodland Foods 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Midway Windows and Door, Inc. 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Whitaker Corporation 2.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Allen Street Hotel Operations 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Northway Construction Inc. 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Glen Daniel Go-Mart 102 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE A-TEC - Addison 22 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.