HVAC (heating, ventilation and air-conditioning) contractors · Texas

Kings Aire, Inc

El Paso, TX · ~37 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Kings Aire, Inc runs at 56% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical HVAC (heating, ventilation and air-conditioning) contractors workplace, earning a grade B.

Kings Aire, Inc: 1.6 TCR = 56% of HVAC (heating, ventilation and air-conditioning) contractors BLS 2.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Kings Aire, Inc safety composite

Kings Aire, Inc scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

72/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.0

2016→2024

Kings Aire, Inc injury rate improved

Kings Aire, Inc's TCR fell 2.0 from 2.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 3.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=2.6 · 2019=2.8 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=3.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=3.6 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238220 · El Paso, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.6 · 56% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #143/408
  • PHOTO The Thomas J. Dyer C…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~37 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Thomas J. Dyer Company (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Kings Aire, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Kings Aire, Inc averages 1.6 TCR (56% of the HVAC (heating, ventilation and air-conditioning) contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Kings Aire, Inc TCR series: 2016=2 · 2017=0 · 2018=2.6 · 2019=2.8 · 2020=0 · 2021=3 · 2022=0 · 2023=3.6 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Kings Aire, Inc falls in its industry

5,793 HVAC (heating, ventilation and establishments

Safer than 77% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #143 safest of 408 HVAC (heating, ventilation and employers in Texas.

Kings Aire, Inc (37 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Kings Aire, Inc
Kings Aire, Inc (37 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Kings Aire, Inc has fewer employees than the HVAC (heating, ventilation and air-condi median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 3.6 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 3.0 3.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.8 0.0 1 0 0
2018 2.6 2.6 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 2.0 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238220 · TX · El Paso

5,793 HVAC (heating, ventilation and air-conditioning) contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 974 employers in El Paso, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Thomas J. Dyer Company 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Apex Mechanical Systems, Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 0F24 - FT MYERS FIRE 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bullseye Leak Detection, Inc. 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Fannin Growing 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bovina Cattle Company 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Skyland Grain, LLC- Spearman Gin 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Alura Cogen 37 FTE
CITY-NEAR U.S. Border Patrol Sector - El Paso 2,330 FTE
CITY-NEAR Alegre Home Health Care, LLC EL PASO 1,942 FTE
CITY-NEAR Office of Field Operations - El Paso 1,847 FTE
CITY-NEAR MVT Services, LLC 1,798 FTE
NAT-TCR Niagara Produce of Lockport 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Versant Power Graham Station 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Kerr Concentrates - Oxnard Facility 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Monical's Pizza Rantoul 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bates Engineers 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nugent Electric Inc 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Vcf 093 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nick's Welding & Fabricating Hixton 37 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.