Architectural block, concrete (e.g., fluted, ground face, screen, slump, split), manufacturing · Iowa

King's Cedar Rapids Block

Cedar Rapids, IA · ~36 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

King's Cedar Rapids Block runs at 242% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Architectural block, concrete (e.g., fluted, ground face, screen, slump, split), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

King's Cedar Rapids Block: 8.0 TCR = 242% of Architectural block, concrete (e.g., fluted, ground face, screen, slump, split), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

King's Cedar Rapids Block safety composite

King's Cedar Rapids Block scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 18%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

27/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.7

2022→2024

King's Cedar Rapids Block injury rate improved

King's Cedar Rapids Block's TCR fell 6.7 from 12.5 in 2022 to 5.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 12.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.73× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=12.5 · 2023=5.7 · 2024=5.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 327331 · Cedar Rapids, IA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.0 · 242% of ind

  • DART 5.8 DART
  • RANK #3/6
  • PHOTO Bassco
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~36 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Bassco (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Iowa employers → · Look up another →

King's Cedar Rapids Block in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows King's Cedar Rapids Block averages 8.0 TCR (242% of the Architectural block, concrete (e.g., fluted, ground face, screen, slump, split), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

King's Cedar Rapids Block TCR series: 2022=12.5 · 2023=5.7 · 2024=5.8 · BLS 3.3

Where King's Cedar Rapids Block falls in its industry

321 Architectural block, concrete establishments

Safer than 20% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Iowa alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 6 Architectural block, concrete employers in Iowa.

King's Cedar Rapids Block (36 employees, TCR 8.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 4.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate King's Cedar Rapids Block
King's Cedar Rapids Block (36 employees, TCR 8.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 4.1

King's Cedar Rapids Block has fewer employees than the Architectural block, concrete (e.g., flu median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.8 5.8 2 0 0
2023 5.7 2.8 2 0 0
2022 12.5 0.0 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

327331 · IA · Cedar Rapids

321 Architectural block, concrete (e.g., fluted, ground face, screen, slump, split), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,192 rated employers in Iowa with headcount on file · 466 employers in Cedar Rapids, IA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Bassco 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lacey Paver Plant 7.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Southeastern Concrete Products Company 7.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR DZ BLOCK INC 8.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE ALGONA MARKET SWINE MANAGEMENT 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Butler County Rural Electric Cooperative 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Algona Municipal Utilities 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Waterloo Water Works 36 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rockwell Collins (Cedar Rapids IA 400 NE) 6,179 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rockwell Collins - Cedar Rapids C Ave 6,172 FTE
CITY-NEAR CRST EXPEDITED INC 3,475 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Luke's Methodist Hospital 2,949 FTE
NAT-TCR Terry's Colorado Home Supply 8.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Dignity Health-St. Rose Dominican North Las Vegas Campus 8.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Garden View Care Center of Chesterfield 8.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Munson Lakes Nutrition 8.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Crossville Studios Salt Lake City 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE All American Alloys and Recycling Inc 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Clad-rex, LLC 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Home City Ice Company Grand Rapids 36 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.