Casinos (except casino hotels) · Colorado

Kings, Queens & Jacks, LLC dba Saratoga Casino

Black Hawk, CO · ~147 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
3.9
Avg TCR
3.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Kings, Queens & Jacks, LLC dba Saratoga Casino runs at 126% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Casinos (except casino hotels) workplace, earning a grade D.

Kings, Queens & Jacks, LLC dba Saratoga Casino: 3.9 TCR = 126% of Casinos (except casino hotels) BLS 3.1 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Kings, Queens & Jacks, LLC dba Saratoga Casino safety composite

Kings, Queens & Jacks, LLC dba Saratoga Casino scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 28%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Kings, Queens & Jacks, LLC dba Saratoga Casino held a steady TCR band

Kings, Queens & Jacks, LLC dba Saratoga Casino's TCR held near 0.3 from 3.8 in 2019 to 4.1 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 0.35× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=3.8 · 2020=4.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 713210 · Black Hawk, CO ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 3.9 · 126% of ind

  • DART 1.4 DART
  • RANK #4/5
  • PHOTO Miami Valley Gaming
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~147 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Miami Valley Gaming (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

Kings, Queens & Jacks, LLC dba Saratoga Casino in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Kings, Queens & Jacks, LLC dba Saratoga Casino averages 3.9 TCR (126% of the Casinos (except casino hotels) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Kings, Queens & Jacks, LLC dba Saratoga Casino TCR series: 2019=3.8 · 2020=4.1 · BLS 3.1

Where Kings, Queens & Jacks, LLC dba Saratoga Casino falls in its industry

219 Casinos (except casino hotels) establishments

Safer than 28% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 5 Casinos (except casino hotels) employers in Colorado.

Kings, Queens & Jacks, LLC dba Saratoga Casino (147 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 337 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Kings, Queens & Jacks, LLC dba Saratoga Casino
Kings, Queens & Jacks, LLC dba Saratoga Casino (147 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 337 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Kings, Queens & Jacks, LLC dba Saratoga Casino has fewer employees than the Casinos (except casino hotels) median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 4.1 1.4 1 2 0
2019 3.8 3.8 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

713210 · CO · Black Hawk

219 Casinos (except casino hotels) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 14 employers in Black Hawk, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Miami Valley Gaming 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chinook Winds 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Will Rogers Downs 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Holdings Acquisition Co, L.P. d/b/a Rivers Casino Pittsburgh 3.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Beacon Communications LLC 147 FTE
STATE-SIZE COS 147 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nordson Medical B 147 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1874 LOWE S OF LONGMONT CO 147 FTE
CITY-NEAR Monarch Casino Resort Spa 1,133 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ameristar Black Hawk 971 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ameristar Casino Black Hawk 727 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Lodge Casino 492 FTE
NAT-TCR 177 Cathedral City 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR EZ Systems 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR American Wilcon Plastisc, Inc. A Division of Airvent, Inc. 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Circleville Family Practice 3.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE CL&D Graphics Oconomowoc 147 FTE
NAT-SIZE AccuTEC Blades, Inc. 147 FTE
NAT-SIZE Royal Crown Bottling Corporation of Evansville 147 FTE
NAT-SIZE 24J7-Enterprise Holdings-EWR (National/Alamo) 147 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.