Buildings, prefabricated metal, manufacturing · Tennessee

Kirby Building Systems

Portland, TN · ~350 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Kirby Building Systems runs at 31% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Buildings, prefabricated metal, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Kirby Building Systems: 1.0 TCR = 31% of Buildings, prefabricated metal, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Kirby Building Systems safety composite

Kirby Building Systems scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 90% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 90% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.4

2016→2023

Kirby Building Systems injury rate improved

Kirby Building Systems's TCR fell 1.4 from 1.4 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2016 at 1.4 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.4 · 2018=1.2 · 2021=1.3 · 2022=1.2 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332311 · Portland, TN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.0 · 31% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/16
  • PHOTO Nucor Buildings Grou…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~350 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Nucor Buildings Group SC-VA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Kirby Building Systems in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Kirby Building Systems averages 1.0 TCR (31% of the Buildings, prefabricated metal, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Kirby Building Systems TCR series: 2016=1.4 · 2018=1.2 · 2021=1.3 · 2022=1.2 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Kirby Building Systems falls in its industry

393 Buildings, prefabricated metal establishments

Safer than 90% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 16 Buildings, prefabricated metal employers in Tennessee.

Kirby Building Systems (350 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 75 employees and a TCR of 4.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Kirby Building Systems
Kirby Building Systems (350 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 75 employees and a TCR of 4.1

Kirby Building Systems has more employees than the Buildings, prefabricated metal, manufact median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 1.2 0.5 5 0 0
2021 1.3 1.3 5 0 0
2018 1.2 0.6 6 0 0
2016 1.4 0.7 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332311 · TN · Portland

393 Buildings, prefabricated metal, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 64 employers in Portland, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Nucor Buildings Group SC-VA 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR RedGuard - New Iberia Fabrication Center 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nucor Insulated Panel Group - Sheridan AR 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Factory 1.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Residential HVAC and Supply : WHSE-Memphis, TN-USA 350 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lipman Brothers LLC 350 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mayfield - Athens TN 351 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hutchinson Sealing Systems, Inc 349 FTE
CITY-NEAR 88050 1,225 FTE
CITY-NEAR ALL 1,103 FTE
CITY-NEAR Shoals Technologies Group LLC - Plant 1 825 FTE
CITY-NEAR UNIPRES USA INC 502 FTE
NAT-TCR L. P. Brown Company, Inc. Wire Operation 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR PRIME Construction Management & Survey, Inc 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Market Basket #31 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Kiwi Transport 1.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE The Lodge at Woodloch 350 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ultra Clean Technology - Chandler 350 FTE
NAT-SIZE Freshway 350 FTE
NAT-SIZE BT Irving 350 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.